1 MS RICHARDS: I recall Mr Walshe. If I might outline the plan
2 for this morning. As we discussed yesterday afternoon,
3 Mr Walshe has a time constraint, he needs to leave by
4 11.30. There are a number of parties wishing to
5 cross-examine him so what I propose is I finish leading
6 Mr Walsh's evidence, the Commissioners may have questions
7 for Mr Walshe and at that point he be allowed to leave and
8 he has indicated he is available to come back on Monday for
9 cross-examination.
10 KIERAN WALSHE, recalled:
11 MS RICHARDS: Mr Walshe, at the end of yesterday we were talking
12 about communication issues that you had referred to in your
13 statement?---Yes.
14 You told us that you are a member of the State Emergency
15 Services Telecommunications and Technology
16 Committee?---That's correct.
17 I think you said you just joined that committee?---That's
18 correct.
19 Can I ask you if this is a correct description of the role of
20 that committee. Its role is to oversight the review and
21 implementation of multi agency emergency services
22 telecommunications and related technology including
23 SIPSAC?---That's correct.
24 SIPSAC is the Statewide Integrated Public Safety Communication
25 Strategy?---That's it, yes.
26 I will come back to what that is in a moment. The committee
27 also is to report and advise the Minister through the
28 Department of Justice briefing process?---That is correct.
29 I take it that is the Minister for Police and Emergency
30 Services?---It is, yes.
31 The committee is also to oversight the ongoing coordination and
32
33.19/5/09 (7) 675 WALSHE XN
34Bushfires Royal Commission
1delivery of statewide integrated multi agency emergency
2services telecommunication and technology?---Yes.
3To report and to advise the Minister on future options?---Yes.
4And to provide regular status reports on progress of SIPSAC
5milestones?---Yes.
6It is to consider and report to and advise the Minister through
7the chairperson on any issue referred to it by the Minister
8and establish any working groups necessary?---That's
9correct.
10The chair of that committee is Roslyn Kelleher, the executive
11director of police and emergency services and corrections
12division?---That's correct.
13Within the Department of Justice. Who is the executive officer
14of that committee?---The executive officer is Craig Lloyd,
15I believe, who is in the major pyramid planning office at
16Justice.
17The other agencies represented on that committee are the CFA
18through Mr Biddy?---Yes.
19The Ambulance Victoria through Greg Sisala?---Yes.
20Ken Larta from the Metropolitan Fire Brigade is there as
21well?---Yes.
22Mary Barry from Victoria SES?---Yes.
23Peter Taylor from ESTA?---Yes.
24We have Mr Waller from DSE and there are also representatives
25from DHS, Treasury and Finance, Premier and Cabinet and the
26Department of Justice and the Office of Emergency Services
27Commissioner?---That's correct.
28Moving to SIPSAC, I have found a description of SIPSAC as a
29ten-year strategic vision and planning framework
30established in 2001; is that correct?---That would be
31correct, yes.
32(7) 676 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1It is to provide the focus coordination and mechanisms to
2maintain and develop the state's emergency and public
3safety communications capabilities?---Yes.
4Someone coming fresh to this area, one might think that an
5integrated radio communication system for emergency
6services throughout Victoria would be the ultimate goal of
7the SIPSAC process?---I would assume, yes.
8We are eight years into a ten-year strategy, things don't look
9to be going very well, do they?---There are contracts in
10place both for metropolitan mobile radio and statewide
11mobile radio. Those contracts come up for renewal and as I
12mentioned yesterday, the SMR or the statewide mobile radio
13contract comes up in 2012. There has to be some indication
14given by the end of 2010 as to what the intention is with
15that contract. As I said yesterday, in the ideal world we
16would have one independent integrated radio network for the
17state. Whether that is achievable at the end of the SMR
18contract remains to be seen. The other options will be to
19consider additional channels to be made available under the
20SMR network to provide additional channels for police in
21rural areas.
22What are the constraints on achieving an integrated emergency
23services communication system?---I would say that it is a
24matter for government and it is government priority. It is
25an extremely costly process to replace or to extend - say
26to extend the metropolitan mobile radio network from out of
27the metropolitan area into rural Victoria would be
28extremely costly, so it is a matter of government priority
29and what order it sits at government.
30You are referring to the separate radio communications systems
31within the Victoria Police?---Yes.
32(7) 677 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1I gather that there are separate systems that the CFA has?---The
2CFA, on my understanding, operates on SMR to a degree. So
3does the Department of Sustainability and Environment and
4also Rural Ambulance, which was Rural Ambulance which is
5now Ambulance Victoria but the rural sector of Ambulance
6Victoria.
7Ambulance Victoria has the same issue that the police
8have?---Yes. The two networks.
9That metropolitan ambulances cannot communicate with Rural
10Ambulance?---That's correct.
11Do you know and you may not, whether the CFA and the DSE radio
12systems are compatible?---I can't answer that, no.
13The road blocks or the constraints are cost. You have referred
14to contractual arrangements that are currently in place for
15the police?---No, that is the whole of government
16contracts. These are not Victoria Police contracts, they
17are whole of government contracts.
18That is for the SMR network that is used by the police?---And
19other agencies.
20DSE, CFA and Rural Ambulance?---Yes and also for the
21metropolitan radio as well, that is a whole of government
22contract. They are not agency contracts, they are a whole
23of government.
24Who is the provider?---Telstra is the provider of SMR and I
25believe Motorola, I think, is the provider of MMR.
26MMR is the metropolitan digital system?---Metropolitan, yes.
27If I can go back to an issue that we had set aside yesterday
28which was the activities of the SERCC on 7 February. We
29had a document that might have been sensitive but I am told
30it is not and that we can distribute it and refer to it
31without constraint. Have you seen this document
32(7) 678 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1before?---I have seen it, yes.
2It is the first nine pages of a log maintained in the State
3Emergency Response Coordination Centre commencing on 7
4February?---Yes.
5The log was in fact maintained well into March but what is
6produced there is just the log for 7 February in the early
7hours of 8 February?---Yes.
8You said in evidence yesterday when I asked you what resources
9the SERCC had been asked to procure and what it had done
10that there had been a request for Metropolitan Fire Brigade
11trucks to be allowed through?---Hume Highway, yes.
12If you look at item 32 on the first page?---Yes.
13That notes that request and what was done in response to that
14request, does it not?---It does.
15You also mentioned that there had been a request for
16bulldozers?---Yes.
17As far as I can see, there are three entries that are relevant
18to this request for bulldozers. There was a request for
19bulldozers to make a firebreak in the region of the
20Reisdale fire?---I didn't hear that.
21To construct a firebreak around the Reisdale fire?---I believe
22so, yes.
23If you could have a look at entries 152 which is on page 5 and
24also 157 and 170 over the page?---Yes.
25Reading those, this is what I draw from them and perhaps you
26could tell me if I have got the right picture. There was a
27request made at about 20 past 6 from Inspector Larchin of
28Broadmeadows to behalf of Superintendent Bull who was the
29divisional emergency response coordinator for the division
30in which the Reisdale fire was burning?---In Bendigo, yes.
31Requesting bulldozers to assist with land clearance?---Yes.
32(7) 679 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1At 6.35, contact was made with the Australian Defence Force
2liaison officer and the request for bulldozers was passed
3on to the Australian Defence Force?---Right.
4The request was repeated at 7 o'clock, looking down at entry
5170?---Yes.
6The DERC at Bendigo, Superintendent Bull has exhausted all his
7avenues for heavy-duty graders to assist with the Reisdale
8fire. This request is for army resources or other state
9resources as all other avenues in and around Bendigo have
10been exhausted?---Yes.
11The action at the bottom of that entry, Daly spoke to Singer who
12confirmed the need for graders, not dozers and there was
13still no answer from the ADF liaison officer regarding the
14availability?---That's correct, that is what the entry
15says.
16If we go back to entry 152 on the right-hand side at 40 minutes
17past 8, Senior Sergeant Daly spoke to I think someone who
18advised that the operations had calmed considerably and
19bulldozers were not longer required, they will make
20inquiries with local contacts for road graders. ICC
21advised of 72 hours notice to move by defence construction
22company. I interpret that to mean that the defence
23construction company needed 72 hours notice of a
24requirement for earthmoving machinery?---I would interpret
25that from what is detailed in the log there, yes.
26So the request for bulldozers or graders was made at about 20
27past 6. It was passed on to the ADF. It wasn't fulfilled
28and the reason may have been that 72 hours notice hadn't
29been given to the defence construction company to have the
30earthmoving equipment available?---That may be the case.
31As I say, that is the interpretation I take from the
32(7) 680 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1notation that is in the log. The other issue would be, of
2course, is where are the defence assets and they may well
3be interstate and not necessarily within Victoria.
4Or they may just be at Puckapunyal?---They may be at
5Puckapunyal, yes.
6If I can go to two more examples, if you can go to entry 194 on
7page 7?---Yes.
8There is a request from Superintendent Billing?---He is at
9region 4, division 4, Seymour.
10There is a request for bedding for 350 people at the Wallan
11multi purpose centre and for some fuel?---Yes.
12That request was dealt with by involving the SES to supply
13bedding?---Yes.
14And arrangements for the supply of fuel?---That's correct.
15That was all done quite properly. The last entry I would like
16to take you to is on page 9, entry number 216?---I don't
17have it. I stop at page 8.
18216?---Yes.
19That notes, does it not, a formal request for Australian
20Government assistance having been made by the State
21Emergency Response Coordinator in Victoria?---Yes.
22That would be the Chief Commissioner who made the
23request?---That would have been made on the chef
24Commissioner's behalf by the State Emergency Response
25Coordination Centre.
26I think you told us yesterday that somebody was deputising for
27him in the small hours of Sunday the 8th?---That's right.
28That is the request for supply of 150 mattresses, portable beds
29for emergency relief centres in the Baw Baw shire, people
30who had been beanie evacuated from Neerim. It also notes
31that the director general of EMA, the Emergency Management
32(7) 681 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Authority had authorized the activation of
2COMDISPLAN?---That is correct.
3I tender that document, if I might.
4HIS HONOUR: Do you want that treated as part of the previous
5exhibit or separate?
6MS RICHARDS: If I could ask for a separate exhibit number.
7#EXHIBIT 21 - Log maintained at State Emergency Response
8Coordination Centre
9MS RICHARDS: If I can move to another topic. The topic of
10roadblocks, I call them, you call them traffic management
11points or TMPs?---Yes.
12You have attached some guidelines to your statement as annexure
1310 and for those using the hearing book, they are found
14behind tab 16 at the very back, I think annexures 9 and 10
15are both behind the same tab. These guidelines you outline
16in your statement were developed by Victoria Police in
17conjuction with the CFA and DSE in the context of an
18inquest into the deaths of two people in the Grampians
19fires in 2006?---That's correct.
20Who had passed through a police roadblock returning to their
21property and had died in the fires?---That's right.
22There was an issue in the inquest as to whether s.31(3) of the
23Country Fire Authority Act obliged police to allow people
24who had a pecuniary interest in property behind the
25roadblock to pass through the roadblock to return to their
26property?---That is correct.
27As I understand it, the Coroner, Mr Hore-Lacy, clarified that
28there was no such obligation, people could not be required
29to leave but nor were they able to return once they had
30left and these guidelines were submitted as part of the
31coronial inquest?---They were.
32(7) 682 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1And received the Coroner's approval and his reasons for
2decision?---They did.
3They havev now been reduced to a card that is distributed to
4members who are manning roadblocks or staffing
5roadblocks?---That is correct.
6The guidelines are summarized rather pithily as, "If in doubt,
7keep them out"?---I suppose that is a pretty basic summary,
8yes.
9That is what it says on the front cover of the
10guidelines?---That's right.
11If I can get a sense of when the guidelines applied. They are
12described as guidelines for traffic management points
13during wildfires so they apply when a fire is in the area,
14when it is going and in the immediate aftermath of the
15fire?---That is correct, they are only applicable to fires.
16To go through the detail of how these guidelines operate, there
17are two kinds of roadblocks that can be put in place under
18these guidelines, one is partial, the other is
19total?---That is correct.
20A partial roadblock may be instigated by the incident controller
21for the incident?---That is correct.
22It is up to the incident controller who can pass through the
23roadblock?---That's correct.
24A total roadblock may be activated by a member of the police on
25his or other own initiative?---Yes.
26It may also be activated by the incident controller?---On the
27request of the incident controller, yes.
28Police on the roadblock have the discretion to upgrade a partial
29road closure to a total road closure?---Yes, they do in the
30instance of safety, if there are some safety issues that
31arise they can do that.
32(7) 683 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1But not the reverse, they can't downgrade a total road closure
2to a partial road closure?---No, they can't.
3Is that a summary of how these guidelines work?---Yes.
4They only work in relation to fires?---That's correct.
5So when there is a fire approaching, during the fire, and in the
6immediate aftermath of the fire. It follows that when
7these guidelines apply, members of the police working in
8accordance with guidelines have no discretion to allow
9through people delivering relief to those behind the
10roadblock?---Look, I think the guidelines do allow some
11discretion but you can't be in a situation if somebody is
12coming with relief that is necessary to prevent them
13entering and the guidelines are there but they should never
14take away the discretion of a member of Victoria Police to
15act in a situation where it is quite proper to allow access
16for a specific purpose.
17If the guidelines have been interpreted on the ground by members
18as requiring them to keep out everybody, including those
19delivering relief or crews wanting to restore essential
20services, for example, then the guidelines may need some
21refinement?---But it is also the case if - people would be
22told that if in doubt, ask. So if they are in doubt at the
23traffic management points they should seek advice from
24someone in authority back at the police forward command
25post or the police operations centre.
26That would be the police command of chain not the incident
27controller?---No, and what you would find would be, then,
28in that circumstance, there would be some discussion with
29the incident controller about these people needing to get
30through and the members are asking to be able to allow them
31through. That is the way that it has happened and I know
32(7) 684 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1that it did happen at one stage around the traffic
2management point on the Whittlesea-Kinglake Road, there was
3some discussion about allowing people through.
4These guidelines may also have prevented family members being
5reunited after the fires?---That's right.
6Where one member of the household had stayed to defend the
7house?---Yes.
8And another member had perhaps taken the children to safety.
9What discretion is available for members on roadblocks to
10allow people to return to their properties?---My
11understanding is that whilst it was a total road closure in
12those circumstances, no person was allowed through.
13What about people who had remained within an area affected by
14fire and wished to leave to obtain supplies, food, water,
15fuel?---Whilst it was a total road closure they informed
16they traffic management point that if they went past the
17traffic management point they would not be permitted back.
18COMMISSIONER McLEOD: Do you believe that is a reasonable policy
19in those circumstances?---It is a policy that has
20considerable difficulty with it in that sense. If you look
21at, again, if I refer to the road closure in the
22Whittlesea-Kinglake Road where people who were up in
23Kinglake on the mountain who came down to the traffic
24managment point they were provided that advice and did a
25U-turn and went back up. People who were residents of
26Kinglake but were down at Whittlesea would come to the
27traffic management point and they would be turned around
28and denied access. So there were some anomaly there in
29relation to that. But that is in the relation to the stay
30and go policy. The stay and go policy allows people to
31stay if they choose to do so. The full road closure is to
32(7) 685 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1prevent people going in so if they go out they can't go
2back.
3I understand that but it is a discretionary aspect of the
4policy, isn't it?---Well, it is the way that the policy was
5intended that if it is a full road closure nobody goes past
6it unless they meet the criteria in the guidelines for
7people who are permitted to go past.
8I guess that is the import of my question, is it a reasonable
9policy in the circumstances that have been
10described?---Quite clearly when you look at what has
11occurred during these fires and you look at the
12circumstances that existed, clearly, the policy does need
13some or the guidelines do need some refinement. They do
14need some further consideration because of those anomalies
15that I mentioned, that it does seem that it is a situation
16that does not provide equity to all residents in those
17circumstances.
18CHAIRMAN: Can I just follow that through. At the Committee of
19Consultations, for example, probably, a substantial number
20of people praised the police but when it came to the
21roadblocks or the traffic management points, there was so
22many criticisms. What would be the best way to go about
23having a change in the guidelines to accommodate what
24seemed to be the reasonable needs of people in those areas?
25That is the sort of preliminary question but you mentioned
26the question of a kind of appeal against the decision going
27to the control centre or the forward comand post, are they
28realistic possibilities, for example, to accommodate the
29problems? Expand generally on those matters?---They are
30realistic possibilities to build into the guidelines. What
31I think is necessary is for the relevant agencies, that is
32(7) 686 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Victoria Police, VicRoads, Country Fire Authority,
2Department of Sustainability and Environment, to have a
3further review of the guidelines and I think it would be
4appropriate that some community consultation is undertaken
5with people who have been subject to the limitations of the
6guidelines to get some understanding of their concerns and
7maybe some input from them as to how they think, having
8experienced the limitations, how they think it might work
9better in the future.
10For example wrist bands were used in later circumstances, is it
11possible that some forth of wrist band attachment could be
12made as a temporary form of enabling people who are at
13least borderline in relation to providing relief or getting
14out but wanting to come back in could be accommodated?---I
15am certain that that sort of activity or that sort of
16strategy could be put in place. Certainly when the road
17closures became partial road closures wrist bands were used
18for residents, to identify residents, to allow them to go
19up so I think there is opportunity to look at it in a
20broader sense as to how the traffic management points could
21be managed in a better manner. It is difficult for our
22people. We have had people assaulted; people almost run
23over; we have people now subject to civil litigation
24relative to the operation of traffic management points so I
25think clearly there is opportunity for us to look at it in
26a different sense.
27There seemed to be - I am going on the general indications given
28at community consultations, in some places, people who are
29locals who chose to work out different ways of getting to
30where they needed to go, got the knock back there but then
31they found their way in to where they were not supposed to
32(7) 687 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1be anyway and there were also complaints at times of media
2people knowing the other ways in were able to get in and
3potential looters also. So there were difficulties for a
4variety of different factors and these are all the sorts of
5thing that you, I take it, want to take into account if the
6guidelines are to be revisited?---Certainly people with a
7local knowledge had an opportunity to circumvent what was
8being endeavoured to be undertaken through the traffic
9management points and we did have issues with media getting
10in vehicles with residents and getting access by getting in
11vehicles and going out with residents, so there is a
12multitude of issues that really do need to be addressed in
13this matter.
14COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Yes, Mr Walshe, you can see that this was
15an issued that occurred quite frequently during our
16community consultations and I think it would be fair to say
17that the positive attributes of the roadblocks were seen to
18be the police preventing looters, the police preventing
19tourists who were getting in the way with recovery or even
20fire suppression, and the police attending to the safety of
21local community members; so I think it is fair to say that
22by and large people understood the difficult situation in
23which the police found themselves. However, they also in
24many places experienced an inflexibility sometimes because
25the local police were not staffing the roadblock; they were
26police from elsewhere?---That is correct, yes.
27Unable perhaps to exercise discretion, so in the review it may
28be worth considering where those roadblocks can be staffed
29by police or other emergency services workers who have a
30local knowledge and know local people. But, look, I wanted
31to ask you, in relation to the declaration of either a full
32(7) 688 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1or a partial roadblock, was there any experience on
27 February of either confusion or conflict in the
3declaration of what might be regarded as a partial as
4distinct from a full roadblock?---My understanding on
57 February there were no partial road closures. They were
6all full road closures because of the fire activity that
7was present across the state or across those fire grounds.
8If I could just make a comment about your comment
9about local people, one of the difficulties we experience
10is, particularly in this set of circumstances, we had a
11large number of traffic management points right across all
12those fire grounds. It is just not possible in those
13circumstances to have them staffed by local police. What
14we were endeavouring to do as the response activity moved
15on was to get the local police back into their local
16communities to work with the local communities and leave
17the traffic management points to other police. And
18unfortunately that is the case and we just felt that it was
19far more important to have the local police back with their
20local communities where they have the great connection with
21them.
22MS RICHARDS: Mr Walshe, I should clarify, at a point after the
23fires had died down, the roadblocks stopped being
24maintained in accordance with the guidelines, but a number
25of them continued to be maintained by police for other
26reasons, did they not?---That is correct, yes.
27Because there were crime scenes being investigated?---Yes, there
28were.
29Because the Coroner had placed an order over an area under s.40
30of the Coroners Act?---That is correct.
31And also for road safety reasons where VicRoads had advised that
32(7) 689 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1a road was simply unsafe?---VicRoads and also
2municipalities.
3Was it at that point that the wristband system that was in place
4in some communities was introduced?---That is right. As we
5became to a partial road closure, the opportunity to
6introduce the wristband system was there and that's what we
7did at that point in time. It enabled residents to go in,
8but the residents were given quite clearly some advice and
9guidance as to what they should and shouldn't do around
10their properties and we were able to then manage the
11residents, but we kept the other, the general public, so to
12speak, out.
13So the residents were given hospital wristbands?---Yes, they
14were, yeah.
15And how did police on the roadblocks go about ascertaining who
16was a resident and who should be - - - ?---To get a
17wristband, they had to demonstrate or prove that they were
18residents of that locality and having done that, they were
19issued with a wristband. Then, as they approached a
20traffic management point, the vehicle would be stopped by
21the police at the traffic management point and they would
22show their wristband and then they would be granted access.
23What kind of proof was required, given that a number of these
24people were away from their homes and a number of them had
25just lost all of their possessions in the fire?---Look, I
26think it was reasonable proof that people, you know, do
27have drivers licences and if they gave their name and
28address, a drivers licence check could be undertaken just
29to substantiate it. It wasn't intrusive, but it was
30necessary to make sure that we were providing access to
31residents or people who had a genuine right to be there.
32(7) 690 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Again, people with pecuniary interests also were permitted
2to go up there as well.
3In your statement, just for reference, you have given an
4overview of roadblocks that were put in place in response
5to a number of fires, the fires at Churchill, Kilmore East,
6Kinglake and Murrindindi, Bunyip State Park and at
7Bendigo?---Yes.
8You don't claim that that is an exhaustive list?---No, it is
9certainly by no means an exhaustive list.
10There is still an information collection process under way, is
11there, to establish when and where roadblocks were
12established?---That is correct.
13Just a couple more matters, Mr Walshe. In para.4 of your
14statement you refer to an information collection process
15that Victoria Police is currently undertaking directed to a
16number of ends: the disaster victim identification
17process, preparation of briefs for the Coroner, criminal
18investigations and also as part of an internal process of
19inquiry and review into the emergency response of Victoria
20Police. Could you expand on that last process that is
21being undertaken?---The internal?
22Yes?---Like any police operation, there is a series of debriefs
23that is undertaken at the completion. Those debriefs have
24been undertaken in local areas, the geographical areas
25where the fires occurred, in areas where there was a police
26operations centre or a forward command post, and also we
27have had a general overall debrief at sort of a higher
28level across the organisation. Now, all that documentation
29is being prepared and being submitted and then collated.
30The idea of debriefs is to identify the learnings, to
31identify the deficiencies and then to be in a position to
32(7) 691 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1take action to rectify the deficiencies where it is
2possible to do so and to also take account of the learnings
3to see what improvements we can make within Victoria Police
4with regards to our response, with regards to the training
5that may be more appropriate for other people in the
6organisation that they might not have been exposed to.
7Can I ask, has that process of internal review addressed issues
8of traffic management points?---It certainly has.
9Has it addressed issues of radio communications within the
10Victoria Police and between emergency services?---When I
11say addressed, it has raised issues. The issues haven't
12yet been addressed but the issues have been raised in the
13debrief processes.
14And has the issue of the effectiveness of the structures under
15the state emergency response plan also been raised in this
16debrief?---In some sense, yes.
17What is the expected output of the internal review, of paper or
18a report?---Within Victoria Police we operate a Critical
19Incident Management Review Committee which I chair. The
20purpose of that committee is to review police response to
21critical incidents. The terms of reference for that
22committee is police response to critical incidents such as
23fatal or non-fatal police shootings, fatal or non-fatal
24police pursuits, deaths in custody and any other matter
25that the chief commissioner requests the committee to look
26at. What we do in that particular process, we will have a
27review done, there will be issues identified. Those issues
28then come to that committee. They inform of
29recommendations. They are then ...
30So there is some kind of report that is presented to the
31committee?---Yes. They are logged then in a
32(7) 692 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1recommendations database and then the committee actually
2allocates them out to relevant areas of Victoria Police for
3action. What is intended to do with all the issues coming
4out of the debriefs is that they are being categorised into
5groups. Now, whether it is communications or traffic
6management points or whatever, they are all being - all the
7issues are being categorised. Once that categorisation is
8completed, they will come to the Critical Incident
9Management Review Committee and they will be managed in the
10same process as we do for any other incident. Again, they
11will be recorded on the database, they will be allocated
12out across the organisation for action with time lines for
13completion and reporting back to the Critical Incident
14Management Review Committee.
15What is the time line for that report to go to the Critical
16Incident Management Review Committee?---I am hoping that we
17are in a position ... we have a meeting scheduled for
1828 May and I am hoping that from an organisation
19perspective we are in a position to present the first draft
20of that particular document or that list to the committee
21on that day so that we can start the process. Some of the
22issues will need to be addressed clearly before the next
23fire season so, you know, time is relatively tight for us
24to do that. So that's my expectation, 28 May.
25Mr Walshe, can you ensure that the report that is made available
26to the Critical Incident Management Review Committee is
27also made available to this Royal Commission?---I certainly
28will.
29Together with any decisions made by the committee?---Yes.
30And can you ensure that that happens shortly after the report is
31delivered?---I certainly will, yes.
32(7) 693 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Just one last matter, Mr Walshe, the events of 7 February had a
2much more personal dimension for you than any of the
3matters that we have been discussing today, did they
4not?---They did.
5You are aware, I understand, that Denis Spooner gave evidence
6here last Friday?---He did, yes.
7About what happened to his family on that day that ended in the
8deaths of his wife, Marilyn, and his son, Damien. He
9mentioned during his evidence his other son, Warwick, who
10he was in communication with during the day. Warwick is
11your son-in-law; is that right?---That is correct, yes.
12It was one of the things you had to do immediately after the
13fire, to tell Mr Spooner of the deaths of his wife and
14son?---Correct.
15Thank you for your evidence, Mr Walshe. If the Commissioners
16have questions, now would be a good time.
17CHAIRMAN: I think the answer is yes, but in terms of timing,
18how much longer can you afford now as distinct from some
19other time?---Mr Chair, I am available - - -
20Until when?---11.30.
21The review process that you referred to, the internal review,
22may well cover some of these things, but, for example, the
23matter of SEWS, would that be one of the sort of things
24that would be on the agenda for the internal
25review?---That's a matter that we would need to undertake
26some discussion and some review with the office of the
27emergency services commissioner, together with the fire
28agencies as to the application of SEWS. Whether the
29application of SEWS will be relevant into the future,
30having regard to the COAG decision with regards to an early
31warning system, I am unsure. I would need to seek some
32(7) 694 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1advice on that.
2Again, going back to the community consultations, a lot of local
3residents, if you like, complained that having been told in
4newspapers and other ways that they should be pulling the
5blinds down, watching the television and in effect staying
6where they were, indicated that that is precisely what they
7were doing and it would have been highly desirable for the
8television stations to give some kind of indication that
9there was a major crisis occurring. Would a request for
10SEWS be the best way of seeing that achieved?---SEWS is one
11option. Another option, of course, is to make direct
12contact through our media unit to the relevant television
13stations. Another way, of course, is a banner notification
14running across the bottom of the television set, you know,
15which could inform people. So there is the two options
16there that I think where television could be used in that
17sense.
18And, again, your internal review process may be, in effect, the
19quickest way that the possibility so far as that is
20concerned could be examined?---We can examine that, yes,
21because that is an issue that certainly has arisen, the
22issue around notification, and it is a matter that we would
23need to deal with, as I said before, in conjunction with
24the office of the emergency services commissioner and the
25fire services and we will undertake that.
26Another matter that is related to that is just generally the
27notion of warnings to the public in one way or another and
28you have indicated that no request was made to you that
29there be that kind of warning. Would again that be the
30sort of matter that would be the subject of the internal
31review, whether there were better ways of the police
32(7) 695 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1exercising their role of giving appropriate warnings to the
2public rather than just waiting to be notified that there
3had been a request for such warnings to be given in
4whatever other ways were possible?---Yes. Look, the
5minister in his role as the coordinator-in-chief has
6written to the chief commissioner and has requested that
7the chief commissioner initiate a review of part (iii) of
8the emergency management manual, which is the state
9emergency response plan. That review has commenced and
10that will bring together all the relevant agencies with
11regards to a response to an emergency and to review the
12manual. One of the issues that will need to be looked at
13will be the issue of warnings.
14What about the role, then, of this strategic group that was
15referred to which has not an operational role but a
16capacity to be on the spot and to make suggestions that
17might include that SEWS be activated or that there be
18better kinds of warning to the public; is that the sort of
19thing that also ought to be the subject of the review?---It
20will need to be. When we look at - even the establishment
21and now the existence of the Integrated Emergency
22Coordination Centre, the State Emergency Strategy Team and
23the Emergency Management Joint Public Information
24Committee, they are not currently detailed as a part of the
25state emergency response plan. They will need to be
26incorporated into the plan and their roles and functions
27will need to be detailed and articulated in the plan and
28that will be done as part of the review of the plan.
29Can I move to an area that is still related but does go into a
30different area, that's the matter of evacuations, voluntary
31and otherwise. Would the process of evacuation, for
32(7) 696 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1example, that you referred to in Marysville be the subject
2of a review because it seems to me - you are asking
3yourself what am I getting at - it seems to me there was a
4possibility of real danger associated with that voluntary
5evacuation. If a tree had come across the road
6potentially, a lot of people who are simply following the
7police advice which was good advice in all the
8circumstances - but if the road had been blocked, the
9police were potentially responsible or might have been seen
10to be responsible for the deaths of an awful lot of people
11who followed the police lead in the course of that late
12evacuation. Now, are the possibilities for and against
13that kind of situation likely to be the subject of
14review?---It is something that will have to be considered
15in terms of a risk analysis or risk matrix format, some of
16the things that will need to be taken into consideration by
17our members who take action in the field; when they see
18danger, what they should consider before they actually take
19decisions about what action they are actually going to put
20in place.
21Because you referred earlier in relation to what I choose to
22call the roadblocks, there is a discretion for doing the
23right thing in the circumstances rather than applying a
24fixed rule. The application of the fixed rule in relation
25to Marysville, if there had been one, that there won't be
26any evacuations, was lightened by the fact that they had a
27discretion to take it upon themselves to take them out.
28That's again one of those sort of issues that would be
29reviewed as to the good and the bad?---Yes, it will be. It
30is a matter of their obligation, their duty of care, that
31they make these decisions and they take these decisions
32(7) 697 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1based on what they understand and believe exist at that
2point in time. But certainly it is a matter that we would
3need to look at in a risk management sense because there
4are inherent risks in some of those particular activities,
5not only to the public but also to the members themselves.
6COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Would your police officers in that
7situation be well aware of the detail of the "stay and go"
8policy?---Oh yes, they would well and truly be aware of
9that and they would know that there are people who will
10make the decision to stay and not go. All they can do is
11to provide advice as to what the danger is that they
12understand exists at the time and leave it up to the
13individuals to make their own decision as to whether they
14are going to go or not.
15I suppose the area of the policy that I am particularly
16referring to is the very clear indication in that policy
17that it is a most dangerous thing to seek to leave the fire
18ground late in the piece?---That is correct. Late in the
19piece. Of course, if you leave too late while the fire is
20too close to you, then there is the opportunity, I suppose,
21that you can be caught in the fire if you go in the wrong
22direction. But again, you know, the police at that point
23in time made a judgment decision based on what they knew or
24believed to be the circumstances and believed that they had
25the opportunity to get people away and they took that
26action.
27Would they have had in their possession information or knowledge
28that people in Marysville generally didn't have available
29to them?---I don't believe they did. Senior Constable
30Hamill stated that he actually went to the CFA area at
31Marysville and got some advice before they actually did
32(7) 698 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1move the people. He was aware that the Buxton Road was
2clear, was open, and that was the way out.
3Thank you.
4CHAIRMAN: You have mentioned two senior police, I think it is
5Fontana and Collins, who were at the IECC. Is it
6contemplated that they would be giving evidence or is it a
7matter outside your control?---I believe it is most likely
8that they will be giving evidence, yes.
9COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Deputy Commissioner Walshe, I have got a
10couple of questions that relate to the operational
11structures on the day including those that you relate to
12the document that you provided us with yesterday which was
13annexure 6 (or an elaboration of it) and that contained in
14annexure 7. In annexure 7 you have provided us with
15guidelines developed by Victoria Police, the CFA and the
16DSE in consultation with the Metropolitan Fire Board and
17the State Emergency Services about the operation of the
18State Emergency Response Coordination Centre and the
19Integrated Emergency Coordination Centre for the 2009 fire
20season.
21Now that you have had the benefit of at least a
22partial review, I suppose the query is, would you be
23looking at the effectiveness of retaining dual sites during
24a wildfire? I imagine issues such as the degree of liaison
25that occurred between the two sites and whether in a future
26event like that you might move to a single site for the
27coordination of the response?---I think if we look at it in
28the sense that the Integrated Emergency Coordination Centre
29was there to manage the fires, the response to the fires by
30the fire services. So the coordination role there was
31coordination of fire resources and strategy to deal with
32(7) 699 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1the fires. The State Emergency Response Coordination
2Centre has a different role, and the role there is really
3to support the chief commissioner, who was the state
4coordinator, and to address issues of provision of
5resources, gathering intelligence which is spread across
6the agencies, and allocating resources in terms of
7priority, making requests to the commonwealth for
8resources. What clearly needs to be undertaken in the
9review of the emergency management manual at chapter 3 is
10the role and some clarity, defined clarity, about the role
11of these two facilities. In my view, I don't see that they
12would be combined because one is there to deal with and
13combat the fires; the other is there to deal with and
14provide the support for the coordination of resources and
15activities relative to support of the agencies fighting the
16fires. So, again, as I said before, the Integrated
17Emergency Coordination Centre is an issue that came out of
18previous fires where it was felt that the fire services,
19the CFA and the DSE, could work better if they were
20co-located in that facility; and it has, it has proven that
21they were able to work closer and their coordination
22between the two agencies is far better, but there is some
23clarity that needs to be taken and it will be undertaken
24during the review of the manual.
25Thank you. I want to communicate to you a perception that we
26heard during a number of our community consultations and I
27stress that I think it is a perception, but it was that
28there was no one in control on the day. So again I suppose
29it is something for consideration during the review that
30you are undertaking because if I look at the diagram that
31you provided us as well, we have across this phase of the
32(7) 700 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1diagram I suppose an effect of - you are representing here
2a high level of coordination and then at the next level
3above where we have effectively a range of organisations.
4There is not a clarity there about the command function or
5the control function. I know that you have described to us
6that the control of individual incidents happens at the
7local level, but I suppose the question is: when you
8encounter an emergency of let's call it a megafire, but a
9day like 7 February where you had hundreds of fires, the
10level of escalation and the appropriateness of the
11escalation up to the state level, is that something that
12you will be looking at, because it certainly is something
13that wasn't well understood out in the community, that
14there was a clear, if you like, line of command and a clear
15coordination of the fires on the day?---Clearly under the
16arrangements the fire services are in control. They are
17the control agency and it is their responsibility to deal
18with the fires. They did have their incident control
19centres across the fire grounds and they had their
20Integrated Emergency Coordination Centre where they had
21their centralised control. With regard to the police
22operation, we had people in charge of the relative police
23operations for the relative fire areas, and reports and
24advice was coming back into the police operations centre
25from those areas as to the activities that were being
26undertaken.
27Thank you. Now I have got a couple more questions.
28COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Just on that point, if we take the
29question of advice to the community as an example, under
30the arrangements that you have been describing, who would
31you see as ultimately responsible for the nature of the
32(7) 701 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1advice being provided to the community during the course of
2the emergency?---Well, there has to be - it has to initiate
3from the control agency because the control agency have the
4expertise with regards to fire behaviour, fire direction,
5weather implications, so it has to initiate there. And
6then what happened on the 7th was that the control agency,
7the fire services, were providing that information direct
8to ABC Radio. Also, as I did give in evidence, there is
9the Emergency Management Joint Public Information Committee
10which was responsible to put out public information
11relative to traffic management points, reminders to the
12community about exercising or implementing their fire
13plans, making their decision whether they are going to stay
14or go, that sort of activity; but in terms of what is
15happening with regards to the fires and where the fires are
16going, it must originate from the control agency.
17And yet I think we heard earlier in our hearings from the fire
18agencies who didn't believe they had a statutory
19responsibility to keep the community informed in the course
20of their dealing with the fires?---I understand that is
21correct, there is no statutory responsibility. The issues
22around those sorts of things are in the manual. The manual
23is not legislation. There is nothing in the Emergency
24Management Act that actually gives any statutory obligation
25for that activity.
26But there do appear to be structures above the level of the
27incident controllers with a responsibility for coordinating
28information being provided to the community. Now, what
29role did those bodies play?---I'm unable to answer that.
30But, as I said, it clearly has to originate from the
31control agency. You know, they know or they should be
32(7) 702 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1aware of what is occurring with regards to the fires and
2they are the ones who are in the position to give that
3advice. Victoria Police can't because we are not fire
4behaviourist specialists.
5Would it be fair to assume, then, from what you say that there
6was divided responsibility for the provision of information
7to the community during the course of the fires?---Well,
8clearly that the information needs to come from the control
9agency and then it can be distributed via the Emergency
10Management Joint Public Information Committee or it could
11have been distributed, as it was, direct to ABC Radio.
12And the police were giving some advice to the public sources of
13information?---Only through our role in the Emergency
14Management Joint Public Information Committee, which was
15being chaired on that day by Superintendent Ross McNeill.
16So would that be seen to be the senior coordinating point for
17provision of information to the committee?---That's the
18role that that committee plays within the emergency
19management. That is their responsibility, for the
20dissemination of messages, not the creation of the
21messages. I mean the initiation has to come from the
22control agency.
23Thank you.
24CHAIRMAN: So it is essential that the information be timely and
25accurate, and insofar as there are many of the police
26members who are providing that information, your
27anticipation would be that they would provide it to the
28public information officer and that information then,
29assuming it is accurate, is provided in a timely way to the
30websites and the ABC so that the public should be able to
31rely upon the information they get either on the internet
32(7) 703 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1or on the ABC for that kind of information that they need
2to make their decisions?---That's the intent, yes.
3COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Just in relation to the Australia
4Interagency Incident Management System, the incident
5control system part of that, I note that Victoria Police
6are monitoring the Western Australia police use of that
7system so I am just wondering is it with a view to the
8possible adoption in the future and, secondly, are there
9problems having two different incident control systems
10operating within the State of Victoria?---Firstly - I will
11answer the second one first - no, I don't see that there
12is. I mean to say it is well established within the police
13agencies across Australia as to the structures and the
14terminology and it is now well established within the fire
15services as to their structure and terminology. What we
16are investigating or looking at is a web-based system for
17logging and managing an emergency. It is an IT-based
18system, but it is operated off the web. It is being used
19by Western Australia and it is being used across Western
20Australia. My advice is - I haven't seen it, but my advice
21is that it works quite effectively. We have actually had,
22I think it is up to three or four now, senior members of
23the Victoria Police who have been over to undertake some
24training to get some understanding of the viability for us
25in Victoria.
26Thank you.
27CHAIRMAN: Would you suggest that we should endeavour to get
28evidence taken from an expert familiar with that system so
29that we can have a better idea of how it operates and
30whether it is transferable?---If that is of value to the
31Commission, sir, I would suggest that that would probably
32(7) 704 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1be a viable option.
2COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Just finally, I note in your statement
3that this is in relation to the municipal emergency
4response plan (and I will just find it again), but I note
5that the municipalities are required to have emergency
6response plans. One of the interesting elements of our
7community consultations was that there was only one
8location where people volunteered knowledge of their
9municipal plan, so the question is: are municipalities
10required to communicate the plan to local people; and,
11secondly, in their oversight of the plans, do Victoria
12Police, if you like, audit the adequacy of those emergency
13response plans?---No. The audit function of that is
14clearly defined as being the State Emergency Service. It
15is their responsibility to audit municipal plans and my
16understanding is that they do that. How the municipalities
17actually communicate to the residents or the community the
18elements of the plan is a matter that rests with the
19municipality, so I can't answer what the municipality does
20in that sense, but certainly with regards to the audit, it
21is the responsibility of the State Emergency Service.
22Thank you.
23CHAIRMAN: Do you want to ask any questions arising out of our
24questions?
25MS RICHARDS: No questions from Mr Walshe. Mr Walshe, we will
26see you again at 9.30 on Monday.
27CHAIRMAN: I had an idea that other people given the opportunity
28would take it to ask questions now.
29MS RICHARDS: Mr Livermore has a couple of questions. The
30understanding that I have reached with counsel for the
31parties who wish to cross-examine Mr Walshe is that they
32(7) 705 WALSHE XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1will do that in one go on Monday.
2CHAIRMAN: Is everyone content with that process?
3MS RICHARDS: Apart from Mr Livermore's questions.
4MR LIVERMORE: I have just got a couple arising so we might as
5well get those out of the way.
6CHAIRMAN: Yes, by all means.
7CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR LIVERMORE:
8Mr Walshe, just in relation to the provision of information or
9warnings to the community during the course of a fire, if I
10can suggest to you the way that it works under the AIIMS
11system that is operated by the fire agencies is that an
12incident control centre is established; is that
13right?---That is correct, yes.
14There is an incident controller appointed?---Yes, there is.
15And that incident controller, in the case of 7 February fires,
16would be either a DSE or CFA member?---That is correct,
17depending on the locality of the fire.
18There is then a structure underneath that incident controller
19which contains an information unit?---Yes.
20And again that will be either a CFA or DSE officer?---Yes.
21It is the job of the information unit and the information
22officer to provide recommendations for the provision of
23information or warnings to the public to the incident
24controller?---That's my understanding, yes.
25When such information or warnings are approved, they then from a
26practical sense go out, as you have described, directly to
27the ABC website bushfire information line?---That is
28correct.
29And Victoria Police, from a practical point of view, has no
30contact with the provision of that information and
31warning?---Not necessarily. In the case of fires, not
32(7) 706 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1necessarily, no.
2But also, the incident controller, whose job it is to manage the
3incident, may from time to time request Victoria Police to
4provide information or warnings of a particular context and
5content determined by the incident controller?---That is
6correct; and that is the process if the SEWS was going to
7be used, yes.
8CHAIRMAN: Can I just check on that. The approval that is given
9to the information officer is given by the incident
10controller, I take it, so that is why ... the information
11officer prepares something, but before that goes out, it
12must be checked by the incident controller?---That is my
13understanding.
14It doesn't have to be referred centrally; so the question of
15whether there is a comprehensive set of information coming
16where there are multiple fires is nobody's responsibility,
17it is really a matter of the local incident controller
18having an information officer and what those two choose to
19provide to the ABC is treated as being all
20important?---Well, I can't answer that.
21It is just that they arose out of Mr Livermore's questions.
22MR LIVERMORE: I was about to move on to the central aspects,
23sir.
24CHAIRMAN: Very well.
25MR LIVERMORE: Also within the IECC there is a state coordinator
26who is an officer of one of the fire agencies?---Yes.
27And there is an information unit within the IECC?---Yes, there
28is.
29And that information unit within the IECC, which is overlooking
30the response in relation to all the fires going on in
31Victoria, may from time to time issue its own information
32(7) 707 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1releases or warnings?---That is my understanding.
2We have heard and seen transcripts here of DSE officers and CFA
3officers within the IECC conducting interviews with the
4ABC, 3AW and other media agencies during the course of the
5fire; were you aware that that was going on as well?---Yes,
6I saw them. I saw those interviews, yes. In fact, I
7participated in some of those interviews as well.
8Thank you.
9CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mr Livermore. Well, we now farewell you
10until next Monday morning.
11MS RICHARDS: Just a couple of things. I am informed by counsel
12for the Commonwealth that she has 15 minutes of
13cross-examination, then that would be it for Mr Walshe.
14Would it be convenient to do that now?
15CHAIRMAN: And she is going to be estopped from having a further
16opportunity. Very well. I think we might proceed.
17MS RICHARDS: Perhaps before that occurs, there was an issue
18raised in Mr Walshe's evidence in answer to questions from
19the Commissioners that brought to light for the first time
20that the Minister for Police and Emergency Services has
21requested a review be undertaken of part (iii) of the
22emergency management manual and has done that by letter. I
23call for the production of that letter to this Commission
24today by the state.
25MR LIVERMORE: We hear that, sir.
26CHAIRMAN: You have heard what was said. Yes, thank you. Yes,
27Ms McLeod.
28CROSS-EXAMINED BY MS McLEOD:
29Mr Walshe, I was going to ask you some questions of
30clarification from this document that we have been provided
31with, the police log, which I am having difficulty reading
32(7) 708 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1I have to say so please bear with me. There is an
2indication on 7 February at 2338 that there was contact by
3Mr Greg Lovell, Director of EMA Planning and Coordination,
4who offered a member to act as an EMA liaison officer?---I
5haven't got the log.
6It is 207?---207?
7207?---Yes, I have got that, yes.
8So the contact was initiated by the Commonwealth on the evening
9of 7 February you will see in that item 207?---Yes.
10At 2338. And then on the following page at 216 ... ?---I don't
11have 216, I'm sorry.
12Page 9. The log records at 216 at 6.23 am on 8 February, the
13Sunday, a formal request for Australian Government
14assistance has been made by the State Emergency Response
15Coordinator in Victoria, that's the chief
16commissioner?---Yes.
17Do you actually know whether that was made by Mr Collins as the
18officer or by the coordinator?---I can't answer that.
19And that was the first request for mattresses and bedding and so
20on as noted in that entry?---That is correct. There was
21reference earlier to a request for that coming from the
22field.
23Just to clarify the position, the provision of defence aid to
24the civil community, there are three levels of defence aid
25provided to the civil community known as DAC 1, DAC 2 and
26DAC 3; you are familiar with that?---Yes.
27And DAC 1 is a local area of request that go directly from the
28local police commander to the local military base, for
29example?---That is correct.
30Those DAC 1 levels (including - I think you have referred to an
31early bulldozer request) don't activate the COMDISPLAN, do
32(7) 709 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1they?---No, they don't.
2They contemplate a rapid turnover such as a 24-hour turnover and
3they are initiated by the local commander's own request and
4dealt with that way?---That's correct.
5There is another level, which is DAC 2, and then there is DAC 3,
6both of which initiate a request to the emergency services
7of the Australian Government?---That is correct.
8And there are different levels which reflect different cost
9recovery arrangements effectively, but both of those
10require consultation with EMA at the commonwealth
11level?---That's correct.
12Are you familiar with, after that first request to EMA or the
13initiation of COMDISPLAN at 6.23 on 8 February, request for
14ADF personnel, Federal Police personnel and things that
15happened in the following days?---In the following days I
16personally made a request of the Australian Federal Police
17for personnel. I did that direct with my colleagues in the
18Australian Federal Police as well as I did with other
19police jurisdictions, both around Australia and in New
20Zealand.
21And you would be familiar then with the fact that ADF provided
22Search & Rescue personnel, emergency accommodation relief
23services and things of that nature?---Yes, they did, yes.
24Thank you very much.
25CHAIRMAN: If I can say for the last time, we will see you on
26Monday of next week?---Thank you, Mr Chair.
27(THE WITNESS WITHDREW)
28MS RICHARDS: Before I move to the next witness, there are a
29number of parties who have indicated a desire to
30cross-examine Mr Walshe when he returns on Monday. It
31might be timely to remind the parties of what is set out in
32(7) 710 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1the practice note about cross-examination of witnesses.
2CHAIRMAN: Yes.
3MS RICHARDS: That is that cross-examination is by leave of the
4Commissioners, that a party wishing to cross-examine a
5witness must demonstrate a sufficient interest in doing so
6and that at all times duplication and repetition is to be
7avoided.
8CHAIRMAN: Well, there hasn't been the request for leave, but I
9think on the basis of the cross-examination, with some
10exceptions, it has been appropriately focused, but yes, I
11am glad of your giving that reminder.
12MS RICHARDS: The next witness this morning is Mark Williams
13from the Bureau of Meteorology. I do wonder, given the
14time, whether it might be best to take the morning break
15now and not interrupt the flow of Mr Williams's evidence.
16CHAIRMAN: Yes.
17(Short adjournment)
18MS RICHARDS: I call Mark Williams.
19MARK WILLIAMS, sworn and examined:
20MS RICHARDS: Dr Williams, your full name is Mark
21Williams?---That's correct.
22And you work at 1010 La Trobe Street, Docklands?---Correct.
23And your current position is the Regional Director of the
24Victorian Regional Office of the Bureau of
25Meteorology?---That is correct.
26With the assistance of the lawyers for the Commonwealth, have
27you prepared a statement?---Yes.
28And attached to that statement is a report entitled
29"Meteorological aspects of 7 February 2009 Victorian Fires:
30An Overview"?---That's correct.
31Are the contents of your statement true and correct?---They are.
32(7) 711 WALSHE XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1And, to the best of your knowledge, the contents of the report
2are correct?---Yes.
3I tender those.
4#EXHIBIT 22 - Statement of Dr M. Williams with attached
5report.
6MS RICHARDS: I should also check you have copies of both of
7those there in front of you, do you?---I do, yes.
8Dr Williams, your formal academic qualifications, you have a
9Bachelor of Science from the University of Adelaide?---Yes.
10A Master of Science from the University of Washington in the
11United States?---That's right.
12And a PhD from Monash University?---Yes.
13And you are a member of the Australian Meteorological and
14Oceanographic Society?---Yes.
15Of the American Meteorological Society?---Yes.
16And also the Royal Society of Victoria?---Correct.
17You have worked with the Bureau of Meteorology since the late
181960s?---Yes.
19When you joined as a junior forecaster in the South Australian
20office?---That's right.
21You worked in Darwin in the early 1970s?---That's right.
22And remained in the Northern Territory into the 1980s?---That's
23right.
24I understand that while you were in Darwin you had direct
25experience with a very extreme weather event, Cyclone
26Tracy?---Yes.
27In 1982 you moved to the United States where you undertook your
28Master of Science at the University of Washington?---That's
29right.
30And then you returned to Australia and took up a position in the
31bureau's research centre?---Yes.
32(7) 712 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1In 1987 you took up a position as a supervising meteorologist in
2the bureau's training centre?---That's correct.
3And in that position you were responsible for training new
4forecasters?---That's right.
5That's something that you did for about ten years?---That's
6right.
7Then you became the Manager of Forecasting Services in the
8Victorian regional office?---Yes.
9A position that you held until 2001?---Yes.
10And at that point you were promoted to your current
11position?---That's right.
12Could you outline in general terms your experience with
13forecasting for severe weather?---My experience?
14Yes?---Yes. I suppose about half of my career has been as a
15forecaster. When I started in Adelaide, I was forecasting
16for all weather services including putting out warnings for
17thunderstorms and fire weather. In Darwin the focus was
18very much on tropical cyclone warnings. When I went there,
19I was a junior forecaster, but in the mid-70s I became a
20senior forecaster and put out quite a few warnings for
21tropical cyclones, not for Cyclone Tracy but the ones that
22came afterwards.
23Although you are working in a management role rather than a
24forecasting role now, you are involved in a number of
25emergency management committees?---That's correct, yes.
26Including the Victorian Emergency Management Council and its
27coordinating group when required?---That's right.
28If I can just touch briefly on the Bureau of Meteorology itself.
29It is a Commonwealth Government agency and it has
30responsibilities under the Meteorological Act?---That's
31correct, yes.
32(7) 713 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1One of those responsibilities is the issue of warnings of
2weather conditions likely to endanger life or property
3including weather conditions likely to give rise to
4bushfires?---That's right.
5And the provision of fire weather forecasting is covered in
6detail by a fire weather directive that has been issued by
7the bureau?---That's right.
8For the Victorian regional office?---Yes.
9I don't propose to take you to that, but for reference it is
10annexure 12 to Mr Rees's first statement; the document
11number of that document is WIT.004.001.0139. We will get
12to the fire weather forecasting services that are provided
13by the bureau in accordance with that directive shortly,
14but could you first explain the bureau's involvement in the
15declaration of total fire bans in Victoria?---Well, the
16bureau doesn't, of course, issue the fire bans, but we work
17very closely with the CFA when they make the decisions. So
18every afternoon the bureau makes a number of estimates for
19a number of locations across the state and the estimates
20are for the temperature, the wind, the humidity and the
21estimated fire dangers. If in any district there are more
22than two locations which have a fire danger, a forecast
23fire danger index of 50 or more, then we will put out a
24fire weather warning, but we will also consult with the CFA
25and they will discuss with us whether or not they will then
26proceed to issue a fire ban for the following day.
27So that is a decision for the CFA?---Yes, it is a decision for
28the CFA, but with a lot of input from the bureau
29forecasters.
30And when the CFA has declared a total fire ban for a particular
31day and a particular district, the bureau then includes
32(7) 714 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1that in its forecasts for that district or town or for the
2entire state for that day?---It does. With every forecast,
3there is a section for warnings and that is included.
4Mr Williams, can I ask you about the role that you played on
57 February this year?---Yes.
6Could you please outline what you were doing that day; were you
7at work?---Okay. I was on leave for the week prior. I was
8at home and I was watching what was happening and I was
9aware of the seriousness of the situation on Saturday the
107th. On the 7th I stayed at home, but I was in contact
11with the senior forecaster at 1010 La Trobe Street on
12several occasions just making sure that all arrangements
13were put in place, particularly to be sure that we had
14sufficient staff to put out all the warnings that we were
15expecting to put out and confirm that we had an extra
16person on at the IECC and that we had an extra person in
17the forecasting centre for media and that everything had
18been done that could be done to make sure that the services
19were at the highest level that we could provide for that
20particular day in anticipation of how bad a day it was
21going to be, not knowing of course there were going to be
22fires, but looking at the weather.
23Mr Williams, if we can move to the attachment to your statement,
24the overview prepared by the bureau, you have distilled
25this report, have you not, into a power-point
26presentation?---That's correct.
27I propose to lead the content of this report from Mr Williams
28through the power-point presentation that he has prepared.
29CHAIRMAN: Yes.
30WITNESS: All right, I will speak to the power-point.
31MS RICHARDS: And I will ask questions from time to
32(7) 715 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1time?---Okay. This is an overview of - well, the
2meteorological aspects of the Victorian fires on 7 February
32009. (Go to the next slide.)
4It is broken up into ten sections and I will step
5through them one by one and then get back to them. So we
6will open up with the fire weather forecasting warning
7services provided by the bureau and then move on to the
8relevant long-term weather patterns, then to antecedent
9weather conditions including the temperature and rainfall
10recorded in Victoria between October 2008 and February
112009; then to the heatwave of late January which was
12extremely severe; then the weather during the week leading
13up to the 7th including the reasons for the extreme heat, I
14will try and give a bit of an explanation for that; then
15the weather conditions on the day, on the 7th, with a few
16hours either side; a bit of an explanation of why the winds
17were so strong on the 7th; then the next one is
18pyrocumulonimbus cloud. Pyrocumulonimbus is a thunderstorm
19that forms over the top of bad fires and I will explain
20that bit; and then the last two sections are relating to
21the actual forecasts and warnings that were made for
227 February during the week and prior to communication of
23those forecasts; and the last section is the forecast made
24on the particular day.
25MS RICHARDS: Dr Williams, I think the Commissioners may be
26having trouble hearing.
27CHAIRMAN: What I am suggesting is if the microphone is moved
28around, Dr Williams can speak towards the screen and still
29be heard. It is just a matter of the location of the
30microphones?---Is that better?
31Thank you.
32(7) 716 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: We were concerned about the web-casting
2voice.
3WITNESS: Okay. The first section is the fire forecasting
4warning services provided by the bureau. (The next,
5please.)
6The Victorian regional office which is situated at
71010 La Trobe Street is responsible for the provision of
8warnings and forecasts for the State of Victoria including
9the fire weather warnings. During the last two years the
10bureau has augmented its services through assigning a
11meteorologist to the IECC to assist with the communication
12of fire weather forecasts and warnings to the fire agencies
13and to help explain that, there is a little diagram here -
14in the centre there is the Victorian Regional Forecasting
15Centre and the person in charge is the shift supervisor who
16is in charge of all forecasts and all operations. The
17orange colours are the fire weather products and the way
18they are distributed and the others are the other bureau
19products, other bureau activities. There is the shift
20supervisor who looks after a number of staff who will put
21out a range of forecasts - public, marine and for aviation
22and severe weather.
23MS RICHARDS: If I can stop you there, Doctor, where is the
24regional forecasting centre located?---It is on the sixth
25floor of 1010 La Trobe Street in Docklands.
26Yes?---And these forecasts go out to the public through a range
27of means which I will come back to later. But within the
28forecasting centre there is a fire weather desk where there
29is a person who does nothing but provide fire weather
30products and these go out in two ways: one is to the
31public through fire weather warnings and the forecasts are
32(7) 717 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1issued by the media and the phone from the web. When I say
2phone, it is the 1300 number for warnings. It also goes -
3they go to the incident control centres where there are
4going fires, where they issue spot fire forecasts and they
5send it to them by fax. But they also communicate and send
6products directly to the ICC. That's the fire weather
7forecast and fire warnings and spot fire forecasts. In the
8IECC, and this is the new development, we have a
9meteorologist who is embedded in there and interacts with
10the agencies directly.
11You say that is a new development. When was the first fire
12season when the bureau actually embedded a meteorologist in
13the Integrated Emergency Coordination Centre?---It was the
14season before last.
15So 2007/2008?---That's right. At that time the CFA was not
16operating out of the IECC, but in the last fire season they
17were so they became a lot more integrated, if you like,
18during the last fire season.
19Just a brief overview of what is actually done at the
20IECC by the meteorologist who is posted there and they work
21from seven o'clock to five o'clock every day during the
22fire season. They conduct a fire weather briefing at 9 am
23to all the staff; produce a 7-day outlook at 10.30 and
24accompanying audio recording available for all the IECC
25staff; they participate in the DSE regional managers
26teleconference at eleven o'clock in the morning and comment
27to the IECC fire behaviour analyst (if there is one) on
28automated weather data which is provided to them to help
29them produce their firespread models; and they conduct a
30CFA fire weather briefing on days prior to expected extreme
31fire weather conditions and that is where the input goes in
32(7) 718 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1to whether or not the fire ban is issued. Twice a week
2they have a regular hook-up with the Victoria SES on
3Tuesdays and Fridays to discuss the likelihood of other
4types of severe weather events, whether it be heavy rain or
5strong winds.
6This is the background map which I guess we need to
7keep in mind for the rest of the presentation.
8I should say to those who are looking at the attachment, this
9appears on p.4 of the attachment?---The green squares are
10station places where the bureau has an automated weather
11station which reports automatically into the bureau's
12headquarters and our office. The red dots are locations
13for which we issue spot fire forecasts and they are the
14localities. If you go to the next picture, I can expand on
15it a bit.
16This is the map showing the Central Victorian region,
17showing the locations with the automated weather stations
18around the central part and also the locations for which we
19provided fire weather forecasts. You will notice that
20there are a number of weather stations here which have
21funny acronyms like VICF, VICH, VICD, VICJ - they in fact
22are portable automated weather stations that were deployed
23before or during the event to gather extra data to help the
24fire weather forecasters provide the best fire forecast
25they can. There were five of them deployed: four of them
26deployed for the 7th and a fifth one late on the 7th.
27There are eight altogether in the system.
28So you say four of them were deployed for the 7th?---Yes, the
29Churchill fires and the Delburn fires down to the
30south-east.
31COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Mr Williams, some of them have AP after
32(7) 719 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1their name. What does the AP indicate?---That would be
2airport. Geelong Airport, Grovedale.
3Thank you.
4WITNESS: So now we move to the long-term weather patterns.
5This map of Australia shows the trend in the mean
6temperature over the last nearly 100 years in degrees
7centigrade per ten years. The areas in pink or red are
8showing where the temperature has risen and the areas in
9blue (if there were any) would show where it has got
10cooler. Clearly, the whole continent has warmed during the
11last hundred years and Central Australia is the area where
12the warmth has been greatest, which is in this zone here
13which is about .15 to .2 degrees per ten years; so that is
141.5 to 2 over the century.
15Now turning to Victoria, this shows the annual mean
16temperature anomaly which is compared to 1961-1990 average,
17so all the blue areas which are mostly in the years from
181910 through to 1960 are times when the temperature was
19below that average, calculated on that time period. And
20then the red areas are where it is above average and it is
21pretty graphic as you move from left to right and move into
22the 80s and 90s and particularly the late 90s and 2000;
23every year in Victoria has experienced above average
24temperature.
25And that is using as a base the thirty years between 1961 and
261990?---That is correct, and that is the World Met
27Organisation Standard to calculate the base.
28This next one shows very clearly how very dry it has been over
29the last twelve years from 1 February 1997 to 31 January
30this year. And it's broken up into areas of average, below
31average, very much below average and lowest on record.
32(7) 720 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1This is over a 12-year period. As you can see, nowhere had
2above average rainfall, only one, two ... well, nowhere in
3Victoria really got average except perhaps right up in the
4corner in the highlands. Most of Victoria was either below
5average or very much below average and there was a very
6large slab over Southern Victoria, notably this area which
7surrounds Melbourne, which was the lowest on record and
8also into Western Victoria. We have had a very, very
9severe long-term drought which still seems to be
10continuing.
11So moving through to the antecedent conditions
12including the temperature and rainfall from October
13to February, so this is sort of in the months leading up to
14the event. (The next one, please.)
15There are a series of maps here which show whether
16the rain was above or below average during that period, so
17going back to October it was a very dry month and with
18virtually the whole state or the whole state below average
19rainfall and most of Victoria very much below average
20rainfall.
21Then if we go to November, the situation changed, it
22changed a great deal and we got quite good rains in the
23east of the state and the northern part of the state with
24above average rainfall in that sector. It was really only
25in the far west that they didn't get the benefit of
26reasonable rains, but if you move to the next chart which
27is December, you can see that Western Victoria did pretty
28well and got above average rainfall over much of the state.
29So between the months of November and December the state
30experienced quite good rainfall.
31Then we move to January and the situation went back
32(7) 721 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1to what it was in October with a very, very dry month
2indeed, and with below average rainfall over the whole
3state and particularly lowest on record again in this zone
4which is very close to Melbourne, this time a little bit to
5the north-west of Melbourne. A very, very dry month
6indeed.
7And if we go to the next slide, this is showing the
8same information in a different way; so instead of showing
9above average and below average, what we are showing here
10is the actual rainfall amounts and the reason I have put
11this up is to show that there was a very, very large
12portion of the state from the north-west extending all the
13way down into towards Port Phillip and including the
14western part of it which received either no rain at all or
15less than 1 mL and even in the rest of the state rainfall
16totals were really quite low.
17We then move to February and again it was another
18dry, very dry month with below average rainfall over all of
19the state, but particularly in the western part of the
20state, again another very dry area just near Warrnambool.
21So that is the rainfall.
22If we now move to the next slide and have a look at
23the temperature. The temperatures tend to work in reverse
24to the rainfalls so in the dry months we tended to observe
25above average temperatures and in the wet months, below
26average temperatures. So if we go back to October, we had
27above average temperatures through most of the state,
28particularly up in the north of the state.
29If we then move to the next slide, it cooled down
30quite a bit with more or less average temperatures over
31most of the state. But if you go to December, in fact it
32(7) 722 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1was clearly in the zone which is less than average and that
2was associated with the rain that was experienced across
3Victoria. So we had a warm October, about an
4average November and then a cool December.
5Then moving to January and it flipped ride around
6again. As everybody knows, it was an extremely hot month
7particularly in inland Victoria. It was hot above average
8everywhere, but over the coastal regions they had the
9benefit of some sea breezes and some weak frontal activity
10which took the edge off the temperature. However, in the
11interior it remained very hot for the entire month.
12February. Again it was a hot month, but not to the
13same extent that it was in January. After the 7th cooler
14air did work its way slowly through the state and took the
15edge off it, but it was still a pretty warm month
16in February.
17So now turning to the heatwave in late January, which
18in itself was a major event. This is a map showing the
19temporary anomaly. They have used a different base here
20and I'm not quite sure why but it still tells the story.
21Where there is an area over south-eastern Australia with
22quite extraordinary temperature anomalies, that is
23temperatures above average of the vicinity of 12 to 15
24degrees right across South Australia and Victoria. Very,
25very hot air and very, very high temperatures experienced
26in Victoria during that period.
27And, Dr Williams, there is a part of Australia to the north
28where the reverse was experienced, there were significantly
29below average temperatures experienced during that same
30period. Is there any connection between those two
31anomalies?---Well, there is. Though it is difficult to
32(7) 723 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1understand exactly how it works but we do know there was a
2monsoon active in Northern Australia at the time and the
3reason for those lower temperatures are because it was wet
4and cloudy up there. When it rains heavily in the north a
5lot of heat is generated and some of it can find its way
6through higher levels down into the southern parts of the
7country, but it is a complex process by which this happens
8and it is not very well understood. But it is not uncommon
9to see this sort of dipole, what we call a dipole of wet
10monsoonal activity up north and then very hot conditions
11further south.
12So during this period Melbourne recorded a maximum
13temperature of 45.1 on 30 January and that was the second
14highest record at the time. In particular, overnight
15temperatures were extremely high and this resulted in
16Melbourne achieving a record highest daily average
17temperature of 35.4. Now the daily average is calculated
18by adding the minimum and the maximum and dividing by 2.
19It's not a perfect way to do it but it is the way we have
20done this over many, many years and we keep records of
21those.
22Also during that period Melbourne set a record of
23three consecutive days above 43 degrees and that was the
24first time that that has ever happened. And in Mildura the
25maximum was above 40 degrees for twelve consecutive days
26which is a record for a Victorian station. So even though
27there was a little bit of relief in the south of state,
28extremely hot in northern Victoria.
29Now, the weather during the week leading up to the
307th, so we are getting closer to the 7th, and what follows
31is a series of weather maps. These are maps that are
32(7) 724 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1prepared for newspapers and they are not meant to show a
2great deal of detail, they just show the broad sort of
3pictures of what the weather was doing at the time. The
4feature that was persistent throughout the whole time was a
5high pressure system which was somewhere around south of
6the country and to the east of the country directing
7easterlies across the southern part of Australia. And up
8north, as I mentioned, this dotted line represents the
9monsoon trough. There was a Cyclone Ellie which moved
10across the coast in Queensland, moved inland, produced
11quite a bit of rain and two low pressure systems in the
12monsoon trough there. So this pattern tended to persist
13throughout the whole^ Finished editing here week without a
14great deal of change.
15If we move through to the next one which is Monday
16the 2nd, there was a very, very weak change pushed through.
17There would have been cooler air in the western part of
18Victoria but warmer to the east. The dash line shows the
19trough of low pressure and I will come back to that a bit
20later on when I talk about the weather on the day.
21Moving through to Tuesday the 3rd, much the same.
22You still have essentially high pressure systems to the
23south of the continent and easterlies blowing across much
24of the country and the monsoon trough is very persistent,
25very persistent across the northern part of Australia.
26And then moving to Wednesday we are starting to see
27an approaching front in the southern ocean. This didn't
28come to anything. It moved away without affecting the
29state very much at all but still easterlies across the
30southern part of the country.
31Then moving to Thursday, as we are getting closer to
32(7) 725 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1the event, much the same situation with hot air essentially
2being trapped over central parts of Australia.
3Then on Friday we are starting to see a bit of a
4change occurring. We have a high pressure system with
5several centres to the east of us and to the south of
6Victoria. The monsoon trough persists and we are starting
7to see some activity here in the southern ocean. This is a
8front which was developed quite quickly and started to move
9towards Victoria. So if we move to the next one, that
10front actually slips away, as they do, to the south-east of
11Tasmania but then a much more active front developed south
12of south-west Western Australia and that started moving
13towards Victoria.
14So we had a situation where the air which had been
15trapped over the continent was starting to be pushed down
16towards Victoria and with a major cold front approaching
17which was only going to help strengthen the winds and bring
18those northerlies down through the State of Victoria.
19If we go to the next one, just a bit of an
20explanation of why it actually got to be so hot over
21Australia. The air was trapped by the large scale weather
22systems which were prevalent at the time and that was the
23high pressure system to the south and the monsoon trough to
24the north, and another factor was the record low rain falls
25during early January meant virtually all of the incoming
26energy from the sun was converted into heat instead of
27being evaporated. You can imagine the sun shining on a
28towel. If the towel is dry it gets quite hot but if it is
29moist it is quite cool and the energy is being used into
30converting that moisture into evaporation. So with the
31skin temperature being so dry it meant the surface of the
32(7) 726 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1land got extremely hot and this in turn generates thermals
2which are just little bubbles, like hot air balloons
3without the balloons, being lifted up into higher levels
4than usual and this happens every day, you can feel these
5thermals when you fly and take off and land in an
6aeroplane. But on this particular day, in this weather,
7the heating was so intense that the thermals are being
8lifted to great heights and hot air was being established
9over southern Australia; not just near the surface but to
10great depth. And then this store of hot air was then mixed
11down to the surface ahead of the wind change as it
12approached on the 7th.
13So, just a little chart to try to explain a little
14bit how this happened. If you go to the next one, it shows
15how the wind was blowing down this side of the trough in
16this direction. Then the easterlies here and then
17south-westerlies around the low here and then to the north
18the monsoon trough. Essentially it is like a big mix
19master, the air was growing round and round.
20That is what you refer to as an anti-cyclone?---No, that is
21actually cyclonic.
22Going clockwise?---It is at low levels. However, and I haven't
23attempted to show this, but at high levels, at about 15,000
24feet or 3 or 4,000 metres it changes direction, it becomes
25an anti-cyclone which flows, in fact, in the opposite
26direction and that stored the heat. I actually didn't put
27that up there. I tried to not make it too complicated.
28But you do refer to the large anti-cyclone in the body of the
29report?---Yes.
30As being a feature?---A feature, yes.
31Of the very extreme heat we experienced in late January and then
32(7) 727 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1again early February?---Yes. There was - at upper levels
2there was a jet stream which was coming down through the
3west and the air was going around in this direction
4(indicating) which is a large, middle level anti-cyclone
5which stored the heat in the middle levels and it was
6subsequently brought down by the low, mixing down to lower
7levels.
8You say in your report that those deep warm anti-cyclones have
9not previously been recognised as a discrete weather
10phenomenon but it is thought that one of those explained
11the Adelaide heatwave experienced in the 2008 summer?---In
12the previous year, yes.
13Is that a weather pattern that is becoming more prominent?---It
14may be but we haven't studied them to any depth. I don't
15think I could say yes for sure until someone has actually
16looked back to do a history of these types of weather
17events.
18Is there a hypothesis as to why these deep warm anti-cyclones
19are experienced this summer and again in a significant way
20in the summer of 2008?---Well, we are experiencing a
21warming trend, as I showed in those earlier slides and the
22hotter the surface of the continent gets, the more air is
23going to be lifted to middle levels and it tends to get
24trapped into these middle level circulations, these
25anti-cyclones. I believe it is some way linked to the
26monsoons but it is not in a way that is very easy to
27understand and I think the only way we are going to ever
28understand that is for someone to do some research into
29this.
30COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Mr Williams, if I could understand you
31clearly, you are really saying that that phenomena you just
32(7) 728 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1described may have been present at times in the past but
2may not have been noticed or seen to be significant?---I
3think that's a fair statement.
4But there is now a kind of realisation that it can be a
5significant factor in affecting weather to the
6south?---Yes, that summarises it pretty well.
7Thank you.
8WITNESS: If you move onto the weather conditions that occurred
9on Saturday the 7th. First of all, back to the broad scale
10maps and if I can take you back to the previous charts I
11showed, we now have this front approaching. It is 5 am on
12Saturday the 7th. This vigorous front approaching the
13south eastern corner of Australia. We have - now this is
14very important - a trough line which runs from a low
15pressure system in Central Australia all the way down the
16coast of South Australia and in fact had, during the night,
17pushed across the coast even about as far as Melbourne. So
18many parts of southern Victoria actually experienced a
19reasonably cool night because of the presence of that air
20pushing up just temporarily across the coast.
21MS RICHARDS: And that changed?---That changed extremely
22rapidly. By eleven o'clock in the morning it was all gone
23because there is a strong pressure gradient between the
24high pressure system here and the approaching low and the
25front and this then brought down this stored hot air from
26Central Australia and pulled it right down over Victoria
27very rapidly and that temporary pre-cooling just
28disappeared. So that little front pushed in during the
29night and then was pushed out to sea and then disappeared.
30The next one shows what happened during the day, so
31this is 5 pm and there was a - this line here, which is the
32(7) 729 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1dash line which is the trough and is now becoming the
2front, and I will come back to that in a minute, with
3colder air to the west of it pushing in behind but still
4hot air running down the eastern side of that weather
5system. The major front is still out over the water and
6that didn't actually come through until later in the night.
7And by 11 pm we have southerlies or cooler winds blowing up
8on the western side of this trough line which has become
9the major wind change or had become the major wind change
10and the warm air to the east.
11If you move to the next slide, that's 5 am without
12the arrows - yes, and then that shows the front finally
13pushing through the southern part of Victoria.
14This is the satellite picture at eleven o'clock on
15the morning of the 7th. The bright areas show the cloud,
16particularly the high cloud. This is an infrared satellite
17picture. It shows where there was monsoon activity, a
18tropical cyclone, but in particular, the front was well
19west at this stage and was actually associated with this
20line of cloud here, but middle level cloud streaming out
21ahead of it over the ocean to the south of us. But over
22Victoria, virtually no cloud whatsoever, it was quite
23clear.
24Just remind us, where was the low level trough at this
25stage?---At eleven o'clock on the 7th it would have been
26just lying along the coast or just off the coast.
27Just off the coast of south-western Victoria?---Yes. Not
28visible in this picture.
29So during the day, extreme fire weather, it was
30extreme throughout the state. Most of Central Victoria
31experienced maximum temperatures above 45 degrees
32(7) 730 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1centigrade. There were a number of records set. An all
2time state record of 48.8 degrees centigrade was set at
3Hopetown in Western Victoria and that exceeded the old
4report of 47.2 in Mildura back in January 1939.
5Melbourne had a maximum of 46.4 which exceeded the
6previous all time record of 45.6 on Friday the 13th of
7January 1939 and this is very significant, Melbourne's
8maximum of 46.4 was a full 3.2 degrees above the
9old February record which was set in 1983. This is quite
10extraordinary when you consider that the records go back
11154 years for Melbourne.
12I am going to show the passage of the wind change as
13it moved across Victoria in a lot more detail. This is a
14map which shows where all our automatic weather stations
15are across the whole state and including the portable ones
16that were put out there. What we have done is we have used
17the data gathered from these automatic weather stations,
18plus where we can from our radars which help us to position
19the wind change but nothing else, so we have only used
20Eurodata at this stage and not incorporated any other on
21the grounds of reports of where the wind change may have
22been until we can fully investigate how accurate they may
23be.
24The first one shows the position where it was at
25noon. Now, the line is about where we believe the change
26is but we have got a hatched area either side of it. That
27is to indicate there is a degree of uncertainty in actually
28locating the position of these changes. It doesn't attempt
29to show how uncertain it was. It is the same width on
30every line. It is just to show that there is uncertainty.
31As we do further analysis we might be able to reduce that
32(7) 731 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1uncertainty in some locations but we might have to increase
2it in other places because of the difficulty of actually
3pinning down exactly where a change is. Sometimes it is
4easy, sometimes it is not so easy. At noon - if you can
5just go back, please - the change had not come through into
6Western Victoria, even though our computer models had
7predicted it was going to be somewhere about here. So it
8was moving at that point slower than we at first thought
9that it might be moving.
10If you go to the next one. At one o'clock it has
11gone through Cape Otway and has moved into Western Victoria
12and that is Port Fairy and that is Warrnambool, so it is in
13between those two stations.
14If we move to the next one, it shows it is now
15starting to move into Western Victoria. What I haven't
16explained and I should have was that each of these feathers
17here show the wind direction and speed, so it is the
18direction from which the wind is coming so that means it is
19coming from north-west and each of those bars are 10 km/h
20intervals so that means it is a 40 km/h wind. And there is
21a temperature of 44 degrees and the numbers in red is
22relative humidity. We just remove the place names just for
23the sake of clarity and can go back to them at any time.
24So the winds are blowing from north-west and getting quite
25strong across the whole of the State of Victoria. The
26winds are shifting more to the west around the wind change
27line which is slowly progressing across Western Victoria.
28If we now go to the next one, it is 3 pm. That's
29actually quite slow movement. It is only about 30 km/h
30that the change is moving. It has taken more than two
31hours to get to Cape Otway and still hasn't got through
32(7) 732 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Aireys Inlet. You will notice that the wind change is sort
2of gradual over Western Victoria as it is moving through
3and it was a bit hard to find in places. So the wind ahead
4of the change is a - is northerlies and then shifts around
5to the west and in some places it shifted twice, it went
6more north-west than west south-west but you can see the
7difference.
8On each of those lines there is quite a pronounced bend?---Yes.
9In fact there are a couple on the last one. Why is that? Why
10does it not move across as a straight line?---It is just
11the nature of the beast. They surge. I suppose the best
12analogy I can think of is like a wave breaking on the beach
13and as it rushes up the sand; it is not a perfectly
14straight line, there are sort of little waves within these
15waves that are pushing up into little different areas and
16making these little arcs that you see when the wave gets to
17the end of the sand.
18We heard from Mr Rees in his evidence that the wind change lines
19tend to move faster over water than over land?---That's
20correct, yes.
21And due to friction over land it slows down?---Yes.
22And he also indicated that the Great Dividing Range was another
23feature that tended to slow down the passage of the change
24over land?---Absolutely, and I will - this will become very
25clear as we move on. But I think I am pointing out here
26that at this point they very often rush round the corner,
27around the Otways and come up towards the Port Phillip area
28at great speed but on this occasion it was moving fairly
29slowly as it moved over the water. But that's quite right,
30the lower friction over the water does allow the changes to
31move faster.
32(7) 733 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1The next one, please. It is 4 pm now. It has gone
2through the areas, gone through Grovedale, Geelong Airport
3and is starting to push up towards the southern part of
4Port Phillip and it is starting to move faster too, it is
5starting to accelerate.
6The next one, 5 pm, it has moved right up to the top
7of the bay. These little kinks, it is a bit hard to work
8out where they are. There is not a lot of data here to
9show exactly where the change was there but we are pretty
10confident about where it was as it was moving through the
11bay. You will notice that it sharpens. The winds are much
12more south-west or even tending more to the south, to the
13west of it and the north-westerlies are continuing here so
14at this point it is becoming a very sharp change. It
15started out as a more gradual change across Western
16Victoria but as it moved into Central Victoria it has
17sharpened up quite a lot.
18If you move to the next one. By 6 pm it really is
19moving very, very rapidly and moving well up into Central
20Victoria. Now, this little kink here, we have confidence
21that that is real(?) because we have picked up a signal
22from our radar in high sensitivity mode which was actually
23able to sort of pinpoint that little kink there. I guess
24that is an illustration of the fact that these are not
25straight lines and probably not as straight as drawn where
26it is away from data that we can use to verify that.
27As we get through to 7, it is still moving very
28rapidly right up to Central Victoria but it is moving
29particularly rapidly through Gippsland. After starting off
30quite slowly it is really accelerating as it moves over the
31waters to the south of Gippsland and you will see the next
32(7) 734 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1couple of slides just how fast that is moving.
28 pm it is getting into the central part of Gippsland
3around Lakes Entrance. 9 pm, if we stop there for a
4minute, it has moved almost all the way to the eastern part
5of the state, very, very rapidly across the water there.
6However, it is starting to feel the effect of the
7mountains. It did go through Mt Baw Baw but it wasn't very
8long before the wind switched around to the north so it
9only just got through Mt Baw Baw and it never went through
10Mt Buller, the winds swung around with a bit of a shower up
11there. The front, effectively, started to stall as it got
12up into the mountains. It is also, of course, late in the
13day, it is night-time and you are starting to lose the
14temperature contrast across the front. So there's two
15reasons why it is slowing down. But it is losing all its
16push.
17If you go to the next one. It is continuing to push
18hard through eastern Gippsland but it has just been trapped
19around Mt Buller, that is. Even though the winds are
20westerly, we don't believe that was associated with a
21change, we believe that was associated with a shower of
22rain. Then we go to 11 pm and it still has this kink. It
23is starting to get pretty hard to find now, as it moves up
24into the north so there is still a good wind shift across
25it up near Yarrawonga. Then we lost it. It may have been
26up through there somewhere in the mountains but by then it
27was losing its real identity.
28While you have that chart in front of you, I might ask you about
29some wind change times that were reported by the chief fire
30officers last week for the various fires?---Yes.
31For Kilmore East, Mr Rees told us that the wind change went
32(7) 735 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1through between 1800 and 1900 hours. Does that accord with
2the observations?---Could we go back to, not all the way
3back, to about 6 pm. What was that time again?
4Between 6 and 7?---Yes, yes, I think it went through soon after
5six o'clock.
6For Horsham, Mr Rees said that the change went through at
71628?---We have checked this and that accords well with our
8records too.
9For Coleraine he reported two possible times, one between 1300
10and 1400 and the other one quite precisely at 1323?---Yes.
11The change was moving through - it was a bit hard to be
12sure but that fits in well with our records. We have gone
13and checked all of his times.
14Then for the Weerite fire, Mr Rees reported that the change had
15moved through at quarter past two?---Weerite - I'm not
16quite sure exactly where it is.
17It is near Cobden, Camperdown?---Yes. We looked yesterday and
18confirmed that was correct.
19Churchill, Mr Rees reported that the change went through between
206 and 6.30?---Yes, that was pretty close.
21Redesdale, again, 6.30?---I don't have this in front of me but
22we did check this yesterday and that was confirmed, within
23broad parameters.
24Bendigo, quarter to seven, so a little bit later than
25Redesdale?---I believe so.
26Murrindindi - Mr Waller reported that the change affected the
27Murrindindi, Marysville, Narbethong area at half past
28six?---That seems to be about right. We don't have any
29reports. There is an area where we didn't have any reports
30but it was in that vicinity.
31The Bunyip fire, Mr Waller told us the wind had changed a little
32(7) 736 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1before six?---Again, I think that was - going back to my
2recollections yesterday when we checked in - that is around
3the mark, not greatly different from our records.
4And Beechworth in the far north east of the state, Mr Waller
5reported that the change had arrived quite late?---It was.
6Which is consistent with what you just showed us?---Yes.
7So quite late might be 11, twelve o'clock?---Yes.
8Thank you. If you can continue with the slides?---Just getting
9back to the strong winds that occurred on the day. There's
10a very strong contrast between the hot air over the
11continent and the cooler air over the ocean to the south
12west and this concentrates the air, the warm air ahead of
13the change and the cool air behind the change and this is
14called frontogenesis. So whenever you have got very hot
15air over the continent running along the coast and then
16some cool air approaching from the south-west, the actual
17process of the air becoming hotter and hotter during the
18day, the air tends to - the pressure tends to drop along
19the trough line and a process called frontogenesis which
20means strengthening of a front occurs. There is some
21fairly complex theory behind this but this is, I guess, I
22would like to leave it, make it as simple as that. It is
23just the way air masses come together. Instead of just
24being a broad boundary between broad warm air and cold air,
25they tend to come together and sharpen up the boundary and
26as that happens the pressures increase along to the east
27and causes the air to run down the side of the front very
28rapidly.
29It is that phenomenon that causes Melbourne to - Melbourne and
30large parts of Victoria - to experience quite sudden rapid
31changes in weather during the summer months?---Oh yes, yes.
32(7) 737 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1A large drop in temperature and a sudden change in wind?---That's
2right. You get the strong heating ahead of the front. The
3hot air is brought down over Melbourne and over southern
4parts of Victoria and then the cooler air comes in from the
5west and there's a very sharp drop in temperature, that is
6quite a common experience in summer. But as well as that
7there are typically strong winds aloft and they tend to get
8mixed down to the surface and it adds to that whole process
9which we call frontogenesis. So just a little bit of a map
10here to try to explain that a bit. If we go to the next
11one, it just shows - the next slide, yes, that's right -
12the hot air streaming down to the east of what is now
13becoming the front and the cooler air behind what is now
14becoming the front but the old front still well out to the
15west. And we know about this these days and it has become
16much better understood and numerical models are
17sophisticated enough now to be able to predict this sort of
18process and give us good guidance. Ten, 15 years ago we
19would have been waiting for the front to come but we don't
20do that any more because we know we are going to have this
21process occur which will bring the change in much more
22quickly than the original front.
23CHAIRMAN: Could I just check in relation to that, the angles
24and the timing of that front will always be variable but is
25that within the normal range, if you like, rather than
26quite different in significant respects?---Do you mean our
27accuracy of being able to forecast?
28No, the way it is coming across?---Okay, yes.
29That one - I have got to go back a couple really to show you -
30but the way it really comes across in terms of
31approximately the angle and approximately the times ...
32(7) 738 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1yes?---Only very approximately.
2There's just too much variation?---There is a lot of variation.
3You can't say that there's a normal progression across that
4line?---No, certainly not. Perhaps if we leave it at that
5for the moment. That shows sort of almost tram tracks
6across the state. Sometimes the front comes in northern
7Victoria much, much more quickly than occurred in this
8case.
9Can I just say my comment is a lay comment. It does seem to be
10pretty well, coming from the south-west sort of almost 45
11degrees and moving across with the sort of expectancy that
12you would have that the Great Dividing Range will cause
13some disruption, but otherwise it seems to be relatively
14uniform?---It does on this occasion but they do stand up a
15lot straighter on some other occasions. On other occasions
16they lie back a lot more and I just happened to notice
17there is an example of a front, a wind change, it is
18actually one of our charts that would have been a forecast
19but very close to what actually happened, as an example of
20a wind change chart which shows a completely different
21picture and it shows almost north-south orientation and
22moving eastwards and then just being bent back by the
23mountains. Yes, I think we need to be wary of trying to
24assume that they behave too much the same.
25Okay. In order to illustrate that you need to show half a dozen
26others to illustrate that point but what you are saying is
27don't assume that is typical?---No. It is broadly
28representative of what happens but there is a lot of
29variation from case to case.
30MS RICHARDS: Dr Williams, before you move from the phenomenon
31of frontogenesis to the next phenomenon you are about to
32(7) 739 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1explain, is that phenomenon that brings about the extremely
2wild weather, in lay terms, that is typically experienced
3on a high fire weather day - strong northerly winds
4followed by strong southerly or south-westerly
5winds?---Yes, yes. So the front intensifies and it
6strengthens the northerlies ahead of the front and then the
7southerlies that come in behind can be very gusty. But on
8the front itself, it can be very turbulent and a very
9dangerous area for any sort of fire activity.
10Thank you.
11COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: I think, Mr Williams, that might have been
12what the chairman was perhaps hinting at. Is it a familiar
13characteristic, what you just described then?---Yes.
14Even though the shape, if you like, of the front may vary, and
15its intensity may vary, it is a typical pattern with a
16northerly or a north-westerly wind blowing with a cool
17front approaching it to be replaced, at some point, by a
18change in wind direction coming from the
19south-west?---That's correct, yes.
20MS RICHARDS: And typically those winds will be strong in either
21direction?---Yes, yes, they will, especially if the front
22comes through during the daytime.
23Right?---Okay, the next little topic is one that has created
24quite a bit of interest. There were clouds form over the
25top of the very intense fires which were called
26pyrocumulo-nimbus clouds. A cumulonimbus cloud is a
27thunderstorm and pyro means it is heat induced, and they
28can bring some rain, though usually there is very little,
29hail, lightening, also can produce extreme low level winds
30and in some cases tornados.
31But that, mercifully, was not something we saw on
32(7) 740 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
17 February?---I couldn't rule it out. If there was one, it
2would have been very small in scale but we have no way of
3actually having an observation of that. They're time
4things.
5Okay?---So this shows the visible satellite imagery which was
6taken at 3.50 pm on the 7th over the fires from a US
7satellite. You are just starting to see a little bit of
8pyrocumulus where the brighter clouds are here and down the
9Churchill fire there was also some. And the Dargo fire,
10that was really just more smoke. So, this is a picture,
11actually, it is on the cover of the report, and it shows -
12it is really meant to show more just the extent of the
13smoke plume but it does show the beginnings of the
14pyrocumulus.
15Just while we are looking at this photograph, it shows smoke
16plumes from the Kilmore East fire?---Yes.
17The Murrindindi fire which was underway by then?---Yes.
18I think also the Bunyip fire somewhere there in the
19middle?---Yes, I think that's it there, probably.
20And the Churchill fire further to the south-east?---Yes.
21And then up in the north-east, that is a fire in the high
22country around Dargo?---Yes.
23COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Just while that image is there - sorry, I
24was about to say just while that image is there,
25Mr Williams. How frequently do you get images from that
26satellite in an example like that?---It is not one of our
27regular weather satellites. I think we can get them on
28request once or twice a day. There is a website where you
29can download them. I don't know the answer to that.
30So that may have been a specific request?---Or else they
31downloaded it from a website. I believe there is a public
32(7) 741 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1website where those pictures can be downloaded but I would
2have to check on that.
3But you say an image of that nature could have been ordered or
4requested or downloaded, whatever the term is?---Look, I
5will have to check, I don't know.
6Is it an experience that the bureau has that when bushfires,
7perhaps serious bushfires are present that you would be
8requested to provide additional imagery to what you
9normally receive?---We don't have - we normally use our own
10weather satellites - when I say our own, the ones that are
11put up by the Japanese satellite, which is the primary one.
12It doesn't have the capacity to give us special pictures on
13- - -
14Demand?---Demand. That's my understanding. We don't just rely
15on the satellite pictures, of course, we rely on radar and
16other things as well.
17CHAIRMAN: Can I say, it does appear that the radar, and you may
18be coming to it?---Yes.
19Gives a very similar picture but making allowances for the sort
20of colour imagery rather than the detail that comes with a
21photograph?---Yes. Radar is actually showing you something
22different and I will explain that in a minute and radar
23doesn't ... the thing about satellite is that it covers the
24whole country or everywhere; whereas radar have a limited
25range and you can only get useful data fairly close to
26where the radar is located.
27MS RICHARDS: I think in a few slides time there is a slide that
28shows those major smoke plumes from the Kilmore East
29one?---I think it is actually the next one.
30Yes, and there we are?---That shows - radar is designed -
31weather radar is designed to actually find rain but because
32(7) 742 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1there was so much smoke it was able to pick up the smoke
2images, get echoes from the smoke. This is the Melbourne
3Airport radar. The normal Laverton radar had an
4air-conditioning failure, two air conditioners failed
5because of the extreme heat and we used the back-up which
6is at Melbourne Airport but it's in fact a little bit
7closer to the fire so you still got some quite good
8pictures of what was going on.
9And you can see clearly there, the smoke plumes from the Kilmore
10East fire, the Murrindindi fire and the Bunyip fire?---Yes,
11yes, that's right, the three of them. The Murrindindi is
12up here.
13This is a graphic that I had drawn up to try to
14explain just what is actually happening in the fires. You
15have hot air, of course, on the surface and you have
16burning bush generating huge amounts of heat. What is
17important is that it is not just heat that it is
18generating, it is also generating moisture. So even though
19the forest was extremely dry, of course it is alive with
20sap and that's converted into moisture and it is thought,
21or in fact studies have shown that this is an important
22factor in developing a large pyrocumulo-nimbus. So you
23have hot air rising and it is carrying moisture, there is
24even a little bit of moisture in the air, it reaches a
25certain level where it condenses into cloud droplets and it
26is taking soot and embers up with it and once it condenses,
27these hot air bubbles rise even more strongly because
28latent heat is released and there is a strong air current
29which flows right up through and carries this cloud right
30up to great heights, and on this occasion, right up into
31the stratosphere which is higher than most thunderstorms
32(7) 743 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1usually get to because of the intensity of the updraft is
2just so strong. There's a wind at the middle levels which
3tends to take the storm away from the fire so as these
4cumulonimbus form, they tend to get or they get taken away
5by the winds and so any rain that does form really falls
6back on the fire. They are electrically very active with a
7great deal of lightening which tends to occur downstream
8from the fires and that's illustrated with that little
9picture there.
10So what you have just given us is an explanation of how fires
11create their own weather?---Yes, yes, that's right. It
12can, they can produce a tornado and there can be very
13strong turbulent winds around the storm, as there can be
14with any thunderstorm.
15When this phenomena is occurring what are the weather conditions
16like underneath that?---Well, you may or may not be getting
17any rain. It is almost certainly likely to be windy and
18turbulent, just depending on what is actually happening
19with the eddies that are flowing into the storm. But the
20factor that is probably most dangerous is the lightening
21that keeps striking the ground and it's quite terrifying, I
22believe.
23Thank you.
24COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Is this the phenomena that has been
25described where the column at a certain point
26collapses?---Where the column collapses?
27Yes. Or are we talking about a different thing - you know,
28where there have been observations of quite defined very
29high columns of smoke and perhaps cloud rising above an
30intense fire which at a certain point kind of collapses on
31itself?---Well, it needs the fire to keep going, so as it
32(7) 744 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1moves away from the source of the heat, it will collapse.
2There's not enough moisture in the atmosphere to sustain
3those storms. If it were not for the fires it would have
4been perfectly clear over that area during the day. It was
5formed entirely by the fires and can only be sustained by
6the fires.
7What impact would you envisage that would have on the ground,
8where a column like that seems to be collapsing?---Well, it
9could produce downdrafts, it could produce - because all
10this air is being drawn up into the clouds. When it
11collapses, if it has got a bit of moisture or hail with it,
12it may well come down in downdrafts and these are observed
13in normal thunderstorms and there's no reason why they
14wouldn't be observed in a collapsing pyrocumulo-nimbus.
15And when these downdrafts come down and hit the ground,
16they can do so with great force and blow down trees and do
17a lot of damage. They are not tornados, they are just
18lumps of colder air that have come down from great height.
19They wouldn't necessarily drop vertically, they might come down
20and spread to some degree?---Yes, because the whole thing
21is caught up in the prevailing winds.
22Thanks.
23MS RICHARDS: I should ask, just to complete that train of
24thought, was that phenomenon of sudden downdrafts something
25that was observed on 7 February?---I don't know but there
26may have been. It is not something that you can readily
27observe and it's very difficult to pick up with radar and
28sometimes we don't know that it has happened until it has
29happened, until there has been a report of the damage which
30we know is consistent with a downdraft.
31So you have your wind readings at the various automatic weather
32(7) 745 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1stations but you are not entirely sure what is causing them
2at any time?---That's right, there is a mix of the
3prevailing wind and also the local effects and then also
4what might be caused by something such as this, that's
5right, and there is a lot of interpretation required.
6Okay, now we get to the actual forecast and warnings
7made for the 7th during the week prior and how they were
8communicated to the public and the authorities. This is
9the rehit of just a reminder of the slide that I put up
10before pointing out that the forecasts come from the
11regional forecasting centre at 1010 La Trobe Street,
12Docklands and they are issued to the public through the
13media and that we have the fire weather desk and all the
14activity that is going on in the IECC.
15There were extensive forecasts provided to the public
16during the lead-up to the event which are done on a routine
17basis. There is the state forecast, there are district
18forecasts, township forecasts and warnings as required. If
19you go to the next one, please. The forecasts are from
20Monday the 2nd which gave very strong indications that
21Saturday was going to be a very hot and windy day and then
22from Wednesday onwards in particular it became clear that
23we really were heading towards an extreme day on the
24Saturday, indicating that temperatures would be well into
25the 40s throughout most of the state on Saturday
26of February. I can't remember an occasion where the
27forecasters have been so strong in calling a message that
28far out. They knew that the air had become extremely hot
29over Central Australia. The guidance we got from the
30numerical weather prediction systems was consistent and
31there was - always wary about trying to make a forecast too
32(7) 746 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1extreme that far out because something could go wrong but
2the signals were so strong that they did call it and call
3it very, very strongly, and the forecasts and the warnings
4were provided through the media and the website as it got
5closer to the 7th.
6In addition, an extensive range of forecasts were
7provided to the agencies from the RFC during the lead-up to
8the event. I have jumped ahead of myself. This is for the
9fire agencies, so there is a four-day outlook fire weather
10forecasts, and I can give an example of that. That's a
11product that was issued from the regional forecasting
12centre at 4 pm on Tuesday the 3rd and it gives the weather
13maps over the next four days with a sort of written brief
14of what is likely to occur on any particular day. If you
15go to the next slide, that's the sort of - yes, that's it -
16that's the sort of information that is provided for each
17particular day with a vigorous cold front which will
18approach the state from the west and - well, I won't read
19it all out. It provides that sort of descriptive
20information to go along with the maps.
21That product, the fire weather outlook, is provided to the fire
22agencies?---Correct, that's right. Also, we issue what we
23call estimates, or they are specific fire weather
24forecasts, for a number of locations right around the state
25and this is the one that was issued on the Friday afternoon
26I think it was. Yes, that's right, 4.45 on Friday
27afternoon. And this is a lot more detailed and gives the
28estimated maximum temperatures for all these locations, the
29dew point which is another - like relative humidity but a
30measure of moisture, the wind, speed gusts, the drought
31factor which is an indication of the dryness of the forest
32(7) 747 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1and how dry the grass is and then finally calculation of
2the fire danger indices, that is the grassland and fire
3danger indices. If there is a wind change expected, then a
4four hour time window is included in the right-hand column.
5How far out is that product produced?---This year, for the first
6time, we do it up to four days in advance.
7And the four day fire weather forecast is provided to the
8agencies?---Correct, yes.
9At some stage does that become publicly available on the
10bureau's website?---Yes, for the day before, for the single
11day before they are publicly available on the bureau's
12website and I believe this particular product was available
13on the website.
14Was this product also made available to media with the general
15forecasts that are routinely sent to media outlets?---No,
16it just appeared on the bureau's website.
17There's two columns there for the FFDI and the GFDI which we
18know is the forest fire danger index and the grass fire
19danger index with extremely high values in both
20columns?---Yes.
21At what stage are forecasts of the fire danger indices made
22available to the public and how?---At what stage?
23Yes, if at all?---It only appears in this particular product
24which is for the day before. I will have to check. I know
25it is available on the day, on the Saturday morning and I
26think it is also available on the Friday afternoon, that's
27this issue. I will just check on that but not any of the
28earlier issues which includes the fire danger indices.
29Typically, general forecasts that are posted on the bureau's
30website and that are sent to media outlets will include a
31fire danger rating - so, low, medium, high, very high,
32(7) 748 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1extreme?---Yes.
2That familiar semicircle?---Yes.
3And extreme starts at values of 50 and above?---That's correct,
4yes.
5But the forest fire danger index and the grass fire danger index
6are not provided with those general forecasts; is that
7correct?---That's correct, yes.
8Is there any reason why that could not be done in the
9future?---Well, that's an interesting question. It could
10be. I guess my concern is that I don't know how well they
11would be understood. People like numbers and obviously the
12higher the number, the more extreme the fire danger index
13is. It is there for the 24 hour forecast so I suppose they
14could be made available for longer periods. We calculate
15them routinely, we do them every day.
16So if on 6 February you had known where to look on the bureau's
17website, you could have had this information?---Yes, I
18believe that's right, that is late on the day.
19But it wasn't made widely available through the media?---No,
20there was no broadcast of the fact that the fire danger
21index was going to be say, for example, grassland, 190,
22that's the peak.
23Of course the fire danger, both for grassland and forest, was
24originally designed to go up to only 100?---Yes.
25And the fire danger rating of extreme kicks in at 50?---Yes.
26We don't have a fire danger rating that distinguishes between
27values of 50 and values of 190, or in one instance there,
28330, do we?---No, we don't and that's because, going back
29to the original work by McArthur and colleagues, it was
30never validated beyond those numbers. It certainly hasn't
31been validated above 100.
32(7) 749 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1So those fire danger ratings, are they drawn from the original
2work of McArthur in developing the index?---Yes, yes, they
3are. They were originally worked out using a circular
4calculator. We have gone and produced equations that mimic
5those - what you get out of a circular calculator, but the
6equations are, in a sense, open-ended, so there is nothing
7to stop sort of high numbers coming out of the equations
8which are calculated by the computer; whereas the circular
9calculator wouldn't have allowed you to do that.
10Now that it is possible to calculate fire danger indices of
11greater than 100, would you agree it is time to review the
12corresponding fire danger rating scale?---Look, that's not
13something that my office would do but it's clearly a
14research project that would have to be done with all the
15parties involved.
16Where would you expect that work to be done?---I guess we could
17look at it through the bushfire CRC. That's one of the
18avenues where they could look at it. I don't have any
19particular control over what they do but I guess that is
20clearly an issue that has come out of this event, as to
21what those numbers really mean and it's - yes, it is an
22area that is a bit out of my expertise but it is clearly, I
23think, some sort of a signal coming out of those larger
24numbers.
25COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Mr Williams, the work that was done to
26develop equations that enabled you to calculate values
27beyond 100, was that work done by the bureau in conjunction
28with bushfire authorities or was it simply a kind of
29mechanical replication of the equations that are embedded
30in the McArthur circular calculator so as to be able to
31just extend the values automatically as the individual
32(7) 750 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1elements were applied to the equation or the equation was
2applied to the individual values?---Look, I don't know who
3actually developed the equations, I don't know the answer
4to that. The very big advantage, of course, is once you
5have got the equations, is they can be embedded in a
6computer system and then when we have got all the inputs,
7the temperature and the humidity, et cetera, clearly it can
8generate the fire danger indices far more efficiently than
9any other way. But I don't know - it was done some time
10ago but I don't know how it was actually done.
11I think you mentioned the cautionary word that there would need
12to be some validation?---Yes.
13Of the relevance of those figures?---Yes.
14Beyond 100 if they were to be used with any reliability?---Yes.
15CHAIRMAN: Ms Richards, could I inquire whether that particular
16sheet is in the material.
17MS RICHARDS: It is.
18CHAIRMAN: Whereabouts? Because p.65 gives a comparable but for
19a different date.
20MS RICHARDS: It is part of appendix 8 which is a rather large
21collection of - - -
22CHAIRMAN: It is close to 200 pages. It is somewhere there.
23MS RICHARDS: Yes. Perhaps I could locate it over the luncheon
24break and advise - - -
25CHAIRMAN: I will browse.
26MS RICHARDS: But, yes, all of the products that Mr Williams has
27included on his slides are contained in the body of the
28report, with the exception of the diagram explaining
29pyrocumulo-nimbus?---Yes.
30All of the other information is contained in the body of the
31report.
32(7) 751 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1COMMISSIONER PASCOE: I would just like to ask a question of Dr
2Williams. You have, in your career, had experience of
3cyclones and the use of cyclone warnings?---Yes.
4During our community consultations we heard a lot from people
5about warnings and the adequacy of warnings and for many
6people the image of the cyclone warning was one that was in
7their minds and gave them confidence of a simple, easily
8communicated system that would give them a better
9differentiated alert. Could you see a scenario in the
10future where any development of the forest fire danger
11index and the grass fire danger index could be then
12elaborated into some kind of more developed but simply
13communicated warning system?---Using that siren, the SEWS?
14I suppose it is coupling the research?---Yes.
15Ms Richards has just asked you a question about the development
16of research beyond the 50 trigger point?---Yes.
17And so the question, I suppose, is the very extreme ratings that
18we experienced this season and given some of your earlier
19presentation about the warming that we are experiencing and
20the projections seem to be toward an extension of those
21weather patterns, so it does beg the question about whether
22we need to further develop both the grass fire and the
23forest fire danger indexes; so the question is: having
24undertaken, should we undertake work of that sort, could it
25provide the basis for a warning system, a fire warning
26system similar to a cyclone warning system?---I think so,
27yes. I mean what we are looking for here is a trigger,
28isn't it? Some sort of ... such as in the cyclone warning
29system where, if I remember correctly, it is when a threat
30is imminent, I think. When I was in the Northern Territory
31we used what is now SEWS but in fact it was the cyclone
32(7) 752 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1warning, the siren, when it was imminent, and that was, you
2know, some hours away, not just about to happen. But it
3gave people sufficient time to act. It is quite a - it is
4a very distinctive sound. I think it was quite effective
5in that situation. So yes, I think there is an opportunity
6to look at that.
7Thank you.
8MS RICHARDS: I can inform the Commissioners that my learned
9friends for the Commonwealth have turned up that particular
10page. It appears at p.178 of the report and the document
11number in the top right-hand corner is 0194. It is not
12formatted in the same way as that slide but it does contain
13the same information. (To witness): Dr Williams, before
14we leave fire danger indices, we heard from Mr Rees, I
15think it was, that fire danger indices fluctuates
16throughout the day?---Yes.
17With varying temperature, wind speed and relative humidity.
18That forecast contains high figures. How is that forecast
19arrived at?---How is it arrived at?
20Yes?---Each of the elements?
21Yes?---Well, we provide - the first part of it I suppose is the
22maximum temperature. Now these are the fire dangers at the
23time of maximum temperature.
24Right?---So the maximum temperature is calculated for all of
25Victoria actually using the system we have currently in
26place and for all of these states, using numerical weather
27models to assist us, give us a first guide of forecaster
28experience with knowledge of how weather persists and its
29behaviour and it has evolved, the amount of cloud and
30putting that all together and also weather observations, of
31course, that is a key point, just not the weather
32(7) 753 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1observations from the automatic weather stations on the
2ground and the other observing stations, but the data we
3collect from upper air by releasing balloons which tells us
4how high the temperatures are in upper levels, and other
5types of data we get from satellites which can tell us how
6much moisture there is in the atmosphere, at least over the
7ocean; that is all combined to come up with a maximum
8temperature forecast. The same with the humidities and the
9wind, it is just part of a whole general sort of forecast
10process.
11I think you have answered my question which was that those
12values there in the two columns for the fire danger indices
13are the fire danger indices forecast for the time of
14maximum temperature?---That's correct, yes.
15The next slide?---Okay. That is just the bottom of it. Okay,
16so in addition to that there were extensive range of
17briefing material which was also provided to the agencies
18at the IECC during the lead-up to the event. These are
19weather forecast charts which go out to seven days with
20briefing notes and then when you get from four days inwards
21there are graphics of likely weather and fire dangers out,
22from four days out. So I will go through and show us
23actually what happened on that particular week.
24This is the first product that was issued on Sunday
251 February and it shows the last four days - three days -
26Thursday, Friday and Saturday, the outlook with
27accompanying charts and some words indicating what was
28likely to happen in that period towards the end of the
29week. And then moving to Tuesday the 2nd which is the next
30one, there was a similar product but for Friday, Saturday
31and Sunday and then Wednesday similarly, just based on the
32(7) 754 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1weather maps that we have, which are generally computer
2generated or are computer-generated with some texts to give
3the agencies a bit of a heads-up about what is likely in
4the outlook period.
5Once we get to four days, the service is ramped up
6and these charts are produced for each of the four days. I
7have only put up the one for the Saturday. So this was the
8one that was issued on the Wednesday. If we stay with the
9Wednesday, we might look at that for a bit longer just to
10explain it. It has the forecast districts, it has got
11little black arrows which show the likely direction of the
12wind, the possibility that there could be a wind change
13which was drawn in that area there. And, so you have got
14the colour-coded fire danger indices - that's the forest
15and that's the grassland on the right. A little bit lower
16in the south-west of the state because at that time it was
17thought the wind change might be through the western part
18of the state much earlier than actually happened. The
19weather map and a description of what was likely to happen
20in terms of fire weather and the synoptic pattern.
21It was on this day that the call was made very loud
22and clear that we were expecting an extreme day - at the
23ICC, this is now at the centre, an absolute extreme fire
24weather spike day and I guess they were words that were
25thought of at the time but they show the picture as
26graphically as could be done. There is also other
27information on likelihood of lightening which is of great
28interest to the fire agencies, of course, and
29precipitation.
30Then we move to the product that was issued on the
31Thursday for the Saturday. A little different in that they
32(7) 755 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1are now forecasting extreme over the entire state for both
2the fire danger indices but still telling exactly the same
3story because the weather patterns were very consistent as
4we were approaching the Saturday. And these products, of
5course, are provided to the fire agencies in the IECC and
6used for the weather briefings they do there and they have
7been very well received because of their very simple but
8clear sort of graphics, I think.
9If you go to the next one, please, for Friday. It
10hardly changed and these are all in the report, of course.
11This is the weather map showing the front approaching and,
12again, we are still expecting the extreme fire weather to
13occur over the whole of the state on the Saturday. So from
14Wednesday onwards we were saying to the fire agencies they
15were expecting extreme fire danger indices, both forest and
16grassland over the whole state.
17If you go to the next one. We are still in that
18section which is leading up to it so I will go to the
19actual day in a minute. This is it, the last section:
20forecasts and warnings made on the 7th on that day and
21communication of those forecasts and warnings to the
22authorities and the public. So on the day the RFC was
23still doing what it continues to do - sorry, the regional
24forecasting centre - producing state forecast warnings,
25district forecasts, et cetera, and they confirmed that, as
26I have said before on several occasions, that we would get
27those extreme weather conditions. And then the forecasts
28are provided through the media and the bureau's website.
29Quite an interesting statistic here. On the 7th the
30website had in excess of 75 million hits and that compared
31with a daily average of nearly 44 million hits
32(7) 756 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1during February 2009. So, most of that would have been
2associated with the fires because all through February
3there were a lot of hits associated with cyclones.
4It must be noted that there was some very extreme weather going
5on at the northern end of Australia at the same time with
6floods in Queensland?---That's correct, that clearly
7doesn't tell a whole story; it is just meant to give a bit
8of a picture but it is an enormous number of hits and the
9system stood up to the pressure.
10If I could just ask you at that point about the Bureau of
11Meteorology's website. Is it designed in a particular way
12to enable it to carry that amount of traffic?---It is
13because the - every product that you access on the web is
14quite small in the number of kilobytes so each download is
15designed to be very small and that is for accessibility
16because there are many people out on the land who are at
17the end of a single line that trickles across the farm and
18we like to think that they have got the best opportunity to
19use the web. So, they have gone to a lot of trouble with
20even selecting the colours that, even though they are
21effective, that they don't take a lot of computer
22kilobytes.
23Thank you?---In addition the fire weather forecasts and warnings
24were provided to the agencies, also from the regional
25forecasting centre. These included the spot fire forecasts
26that were actually issued for the fires.
27If I could stop you there, what is a spot fire forecast. We
28have had a lot of talk about spot fires and I think that is
29a different thing from spot fire forecasts?---Yes. When
30requested by the agencies, they fax in a request for a
31special forecast which is a tailored forecast for a
32(7) 757 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1particular area which is for a fire, a fire site. So,
2during the day they send in these requests and we produce
3forecasts and there is an example which I will put up on
4the screen in a minute but they are tailored forecasts.
5They are quite different from the general forecasts that we
6put out in that they are - it is the best we can do to try
7to predict what the weather is going to be, whether it is
8going to be at the actual fire site. It takes into account
9where possible the terrain, where the wind is likely to
10flow up and down mountains, or it might be different at the
11top of a mountain than down below and it is done, as I
12said, on request for a client.
13Do those forecasts include a forecast of the likely timing of
14any wind change that is expected?---Yes, yes, but in a
15fairly broad sort of a block, yes.
16COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Do the forecasts, spot fire forecasts,
17take into account the vegetation in the area?---No. We
18leave it to the agencies to work out what might be actually
19occurring in the particular locality. That is one thing we
20don't know about. We try to stick to the weather.
21So they could make some kind of extrapolation based on the
22acknowledge of vegetation?---Yes, that's right.
23During the whole day there was frequent communication
24between the regional and forecast centre and the
25meteorologist at the IECC. The phone was running the whole
26day. And also at the IECC the forecaster there and - I
27haven't actually - I put it in the report but I haven't
28made a point of it here. We rostered on an extra person on
29that particular day. Normally there would only be one
30person on between 7 and 5 but we were requested to provide
31an extra meteorologist and a second person came on from
32(7) 758 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1three o'clock in the afternoon and worked until about 2.30
2the next morning. So in fact there were two meteorologists
3at the IECC during that particularly busy period when the
4wind change was moving through central parts of Victoria.
5And there is an account of the activities of those
6meteorologists in the report starting at p.57?---That's
7correct, yes.
8Okay, next. This is a summary of the forecasts that
9were issued from the regional forecasting centre during
10that day, starting at around 3.30 in the morning. The red
11ones are fire related products and the ones with the star
12are those which are specifically for the fire agencies. So
13the first one was the fire ban advice which was just a
14rehit of what the CFA had issued, a fire weather warning,
15then a severe weather warning for the strong winds and then
16three spot fire forecasts, and this is, of course, for
17fires that were already going to the 7th February and they
18were provided for the agencies.
19And provided at the request of the agencies?---At the request of
20the agencies, that's correct, yes. As you can see, as the
21day went on there were a large number - there was a lot of
22activity producing spot fire forecasts specifically for the
23locations for which they were requested and that was done
24by the fire weather forecaster on the fire weather desk
25with the assistance of an extra person who was working
26alongside him who was monitoring the thunderstorms but also
27doing spot fire weather forecasts.
28Running my eyes down that list I do not see a spot fire weather
29forecast for Murrindindi?---That's correct. We did not
30receive a request for a Murrindindi spot fire forecast
31until the following morning just before two o'clock.
32(7) 759 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1CHAIRMAN: 3.37 am?---That is when it was issued, yes.
2The fire weather briefing which was issued on the
3Saturday was very similar to the ones that were issued in
4the lead-up on the Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. I
5didn't really have to change the words all that much, it
6really just confirmed everything that had been said before.
7That is an example of a spot fire forecast. That is one
8for Churchill, I think it was. Yes. And it gives an
9example of the type of information that is included. The
10request includes the location and this is received by fax
11and we enter that material into - the request into our
12systems and then we write a weather overview and it
13includes - somewhere in there there is a wind change; yes,
14that is looking at the wind change to affect the fire area
15between 1730 and 1900, I think that is. And then further
16down there's a tabular information on sort of a three hour
17by three hour, blow by blow of what is expected with the
18temperature, the relative humidity, the winds and the two
19fire danger indices. That's worked out for the whole state
20but with no adjustment for the particular localities. As
21time goes on, the fire danger indices drop dramatically
22after the wind change had gone through. So that's one of
23very, very many spot fire forecasts that were issued during
24that afternoon.
25The other product that is issued is the wind change
26forecast chart which is one fairly general sort of product
27which indicates likely positions or our best estimates of
28where the wind change is likely to be in three hourly or
29thereabouts time blocks. This is the first one that was
30issued at 1200. Now, we don't normally issue one before
31the wind change has moved across the coast and before we
32(7) 760 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1have some idea of how quickly the wind change is moving but
2because the day was so extreme, the forecasters in the
3regional forecast centre decided to put one out anyway just
4to give the agencies a bit of a heads-up of what we were
5thinking. At that stage it was still yet to hit the coast.
6Then the next one was issued at 10 to 2 after which
7time the change had actually passed through Western
8Victoria, with estimates of the time that it was likely to
9move eastwards across into eastern Victoria. The next one
10was issued at 4.30 pm when the change was starting to move
11or had moved into Port Phillip area and it was predicted to
12push right up into north eastern Victoria and the last one
13was that was issued was at 1830 which was when the change
14was pushing right through that area.
15Just having looked at those wind change forecast charts in
16succession, there is a statement at paragraph 340 of
17Mr Waller's statement in relation to the Murrindindi fire
18where he says the south-westerly wind change entered the
19region at 1830 and that it arrived earlier than predicted
20and passed through the area with greater force than had
21been forecast". Would you like to respond to that
22statement?---Well, he could only have been working off the
23wind change chart, as far as I know, because that's the
24only forecaster that we had, and it is true that the
25prediction of the forecast lines of position were slow. As
26I pointed out before, the wind change is moving slowly
27across Western Australia and then it accelerated greatly,
28doubled in speed in Western Victoria. So after that wind
29change chart, yes, the lines did indicate that it would
30come through a bit later; however, the forecasters at the
31IECC - both of them were in constant communication with the
32(7) 761 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1state duty officer - they had picked up that the change was
2moving more rapidly than the chart and had conveyed that
3information to the staff at the IECC as the afternoon
4progressed. So, whilst the change chart might have been a
5bit slow, it was verbally passed on to the IECC as rapidly
6as they possibly could.
7While we are on the subject of communications between the
8forecasters and people at the IECC, are you able to tell us
9whether the forecasters, Mr Parkin and Mr Williams, had any
10communications with Dr Kevin Tolhurst, the fire behaviour
11scientist?---I think Kevin Tolhurst may have had some
12communication - Kevin Parkin might have had some
13communication with Kevin Tolhurst a bit earlier in the day.
14They don't work side by side, the fire behaviour analyst is
15in another area so they have ... as I recollect, he did
16have communication but not a great deal of communication.
17Thank you?---This is just a very short summary stating what
18happened, that there was an exceptional event on
197 February, exceptional heat accompanied by very strong
20winds and a vigorous change that moved from west to east
21during the day, and the details are contained in the report
22which is an attachment to my statement.
23Thank you, Dr Williams. May we include the slides of that
24presentation within the exhibit?
25CHAIRMAN: If the answer is that it is readily capable of being
26put onto a DVD, if it is not already, that is the sensible
27thing to do?---Yes, I brought it on a CD so.
28All right, the CD is part of the exhibit.
29MS RICHARDS: What I will do is create a cross-reference sheet
30that cross-references the slides to the page in the report.
31Just one final matter before I sit down,
32(7) 762 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Dr Williams. You would be aware of a review produced by
2Bruce Esplin of the April 08 windstorm?---Yes.
3Which we have been taken to previously. There was a
4recommendation made in that review that the Bureau of
5Meteorology contact list for severe weather warnings be
6strategically managed in consultation with emergency
7service organisations to identify critical contacts and it
8was also recommended that the bureau must ensure the detail
9for these critical contacts remains up to date. Could you
10tell us what action the bureau has taken in response to
11that recommendation?---We haven't specifically worked with
12the ESOs to strategically work out the contact lists;
13however - - -
14I think I should stop you at that point. When did you become
15aware of this report?---Oh. I didn't see the final version
16of the report until just a week or so ago.
17Do you know when it was made available to the bureau?---No, I
18don't think that we actually - we downloaded it from the
19website. However, we did have correspondence with someone
20from the - Brian O'Brien, the emergency services officer,
21who spoke to us and he told us what was likely to be in the
22report but we did not actually see the final version of the
23report. We downloaded it from the website and I think it
24is still labelled "confidential". However, we have
25reviewed all our contacts. They are up to date. It is
26very extensive for our severe weather warnings, there are
27over 100 or so on the list, but in terms of actually sort
28of working through that recommendation to the letter, we
29haven't done it yet but I see no reason - well, I will take
30an undertaking to do it, put it that way.
31Thank you, Dr Williams. I have no further questions. If you
32(7) 763 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1would wait there, I think there might be some other
2questions for you.
3CHAIRMAN: Could I just inquire - I think we will adjourn now -
4could I inquire who else seeks to ask questions.
5MS MCLEOD: I may have some clarifying questions on behalf of
6the Commonwealth but I would prefer to go, as we did
7yesterday, second last as it were.
8MR LIVERMORE: I have about ten or fifteen minutes worth.
9CHAIRMAN: I think it is sufficiently long that we will - if it
10had been very quick I would have postponed lunch but I
11think in the circumstances we will commence at two o'clock.
12(THE WITNESS WITHDREW)
13LUNCHEON ADJOURNMENT
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32(7) 764 WILLIAMS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1
2UPON RESUMING AT 2.00 PM:
3MARK WILLIAMS, recalled:
4CROSS-EXAMINED BY MR LIVERMORE:
5Dr Williams, just a couple of questions about the wind change
6charts that were towards the end of your presentation. I
7think there was one at 1830 and one before that on the
87th?---It is right at the end.
9That is one at 12 o'clock. If we go back to the 1630. That is
10a wind change forecast chart issued by the bureau at 1630
11on 7 February?---Yes.
12Can you just interpret for us, Dr Williams, when that chart has
13the wind change going through the Kilmore area?---On that
14chart it would have gone through just before 2000, which is
158 o'clock.
16The Marysville area?---The Marysville area, which is to the
17right of the arrow, some time after 8 o'clock.
18Between 20 and 2300?---Yes.
19If you could go to the 1830 chart, and that line that says
20"actual"?---Yes.
21Is that an estimate, or was that the actual position of the wind
22change as best could be anticipated at that time?---It was
23the best as could be estimated at that time. I think it
24was, on looking back at it, it was probably, it is not
25clear there, it was the 6 p.m. position rather than the
266.30 position, at 1800.
27Does it say that anywhere on the document?---No, it doesn't, it
28is not clear.
29In any event, that has got the actual not far from Kilmore, or
30about ready to go through Kilmore?---Yes.
31Marysville, we are still looking at about 2100?---Yes.
32(7) 765 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1You were taken to the evidence that Mr Waller gave to the
2general effect that the wind change actually moved through
3the Murrindindi, Marysville area. It got there a bit more
4quickly than the bureau had been anticipating?---Yes.
5You don't have any quarrel with that evidence, do you?---Based
6off that chart, he said off the forecast, and that is true.
7As I said before, our forecasters at the IECC did verbally
8advise staff at the IECC that the wind change was moving
9faster.
10They would not, however, have been telling anyone at the IECC at
111830 anything different to what is depicted on the chart as
12at 1830, would they?---As at 1830, I don't think so, not at
131830, not after that particular chart had come through.
14So you had spoken to the bureau officers who were on duty at the
15IECC?---Yes.
16And they have told you in general terms that they were providing
17briefings, and at some point gave indication that the wind
18change was moving more quickly than previously anticipated?
19---Yes.
20Just a couple of questions in relation to convection columns,
21and please tell me if these questions go beyond your area
22of expertise. They relate to some issues raised by
23Commissioner McLeod earlier. Is it true to say that every
24fire has a convection column?---Yes, I think that is true,
25though most of them are very small and don't produce
26anything more than an invisible bubble in the area, put it
27that way, yes.
28But large bushfires of the kind that we had on 7 February are
29capable of producing very large convection
30columns?---That's correct, yes.
31Is there any way that during the course of a fire that the
32(7) 766 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1bureau can first of all identify the fact that a large
2convection column exists in relation to a particular
3fire?---If it has got cloud in it and it has got cloud
4droplets that can be returned from radar, the radar is the
5best possible tool to identify that it is there.
6Does the bureau endeavour to do that during the course of
7running bushfires?---Yes, because there is a person who is
8rostered on to look after, to watch out for convection, and
9it is just a form of convection, if you like, so there may
10be other thunderstorms that they have to monitor, it is a
11thunderstorm that has been precipitated by the fire, and it
12would be monitored and followed as with other storms.
13These large convection columns have the capacity, do they not,
14to cause embers to spot a much greater distance than might
15otherwise be the case?---That is my understanding, yes.
16Is it the case that, indeed, depending upon the size of the
17convection column, that they can cause spotting out to 35
18kilometres or something thereabouts?---I am not an expert
19in this area, but that, I don't know about 35 kilometres,
20but certainly the embers would be carried that far, whether
21or not the embers are capable of starting new fires that
22far down, I don't know.
23Did the existence of any convection, large convection columns
24associated with the fires on 7 February, did any such
25observation find its way into any report that the bureau
26did during the course of the day regarding the weather
27conditions?---No, you mean the actual thunderstorms and the
28way it might have affected the weather, is that what you
29are saying?
30Yes?---No, it is on a very fine scale which we have not picked
31up, or so far identified from our automatic weather
32(7) 767 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1stations. If, down the track, there is evidence that there
2may have been some, a downburst, as we were discussing
3before, did occur, and we can find evidence of it, well
4then we would look at reporting on that.
5That is after the event?---After the event, yes.
6You are reliant upon an analysis of material after the
7event?---Exactly, yes.
8Has any such analysis occurred in relation to the Kilmore East
9and Murrindindi fires?---No.
10As far as the bureau is concerned at this stage it is not able
11to help the Commission either way on whether there was a
12small, medium or large convection column and what happened
13to such convection columns?---We know there was a large
14convection column, we can certainly show that on radar, but
15what the effects may be, we haven't done any work on that
16at this stage.
17A large convection column can have a dramatic impact upon the
18local weather that the column is near or over?---Oh, yes,
19yes.
20Is that right?---Yes.
21And indeed, can cause at ground level different direction and
22velocity of winds that is otherwise applying in the
23area?---That is certainly true.
24This phenomenon of a convection column collapsing, I gathered
25from your answers to Commissioner McLeod that if that
26occurs, its impact on the local area can be quite
27dramatic?---Well, it depends on whether it collapses
28rapidly or whether, in fact, there is a downburst from
29colder air aloft which collapses and hits the ground with
30great force, and these things are very unpredictable. I
31wouldn't want to say whether it would have happened or it
32(7) 768 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1wouldn't have happened. It may have collapsed and just
2dissipated in a more gradual way, I don't know.
3The bureau's position is that at the moment it doesn't know
4either way in terms of Kilmore East and Murrindindi fires
5as to whether a collapsing convection column had some or
6great or little impact upon damages to houses and the
7course of the fire, et cetera?---At this stage, no.
8In general terms though, could a large convection column that
9collapses cause by itself significant damages to
10buildings?---To buildings?
11Houses?---Look, it depends on the structure of the buildings, I
12don't know how I can answer that.
13Is the answer yes, depending on the circumstances?---It would
14depend on the circumstances and the structure. It can do
15damage to trees, I know that.
16Thank you, that is all.
17CROSS-EXAMINED BY MS MCLEOD:
18Dr Williams, just some clarification arising from those
19questions. The first is, you were asked about wind change
20charts for Kilmore and Marysville and the prediction of the
21wind change time. Can I just ask you to explain the time
22the front passes through a particular region, is that the
23time that the bureau would expect to see instant wind
24changes, or shortly around that time?---It depends on
25whether or not the wind change is sharply defined. In some
26areas it would change from a northwesterly to a
27southwesterly in a matter of 10, 15 minutes, but on other
28occasions it can take two hours to swing all the way
29around.
30On your graph, or your graphic you had the representation of the
31wind change, or the front moving through, with the blurred
32(7) 769 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1lines on the side?---Yes.
2Of the thick lines that represented the front, could you just
3explain to the Commission why there is a degree of
4approximation around those lines?---What we have done is,
5we have looked at the automatic weather stations and as far
6as we can tell, made a judgment as to where those lines are
7between where it was, the wind was from the northwest and
8has gone right around to the southwest. One of the factors
9that we take into account is the humidity. If you look at
10the red numbers of the automatic weather stations they are
11higher, which means the relatively humidity rises behind
12the change, that is one of the things that tells us that a
13change has gone through. The air ahead of it tends to be
14much drier. The only other thing is the temperature falls
15but it does not fall necessarily very quickly. For
16example, it is still 41.
17In the north of the state?---The north of the state is still 41.
18Whether are not the change has fully gone through that is
19problematical. At the moment we have someone who is
20working on this very problem and is doing a very detailed
21analysis of every single automatic - every station across
22the state to try to determine the point at which the change
23started to go through and the point at which the change
24finished going through to try to get a much better idea of
25how long that actually took at each particular location.
26It will be very different for some stations than others.
27This is retrospective analysis?---Yes.
28One of the difficulties in interpreting the data coming from
29your weather stations and radars ahead of time is to know
30how quickly the front will be moving?---Yes.
31And what immediate impact it will have or what delayed impact it
32(7) 770 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1will have on local weather conditions, would that be a fair
2statement?---Yes.
3As best as the science is able, you express an opinion in terms
4of the expected time as a range?---Yes.
5To fire services?---Yes. That's right.
6When you issue weather change charts, for example, I have
7noticed the one Mr Livermore took you to, says, "Timing of
8wind changes cannot be forecast with precision and
9positions are best estimates"?---That's correct, yes.
10You have the ability or fire services have the ability to ask
11for the spot fire forecast as well, don't you?---Yes.
12That enables or a request for a spot fire forecast triggers the
13bureau to respond to a request from either CFA or DSE to
14look at conditions local to the area they have specifically
15identified?---That's right.
16Just in terms of Kilmore and Marysville, at Kilmore, there were
17spot fire forecasts issued on three occasions on 7
18February. Those are annexed in your appendix?---That is
19correct, yes.
20There was one for Murrindindi but late in the evening?---Yes.
21It wasn't until early next morning.
22In terms of looking at efficiencies in the system and matters
23that you have turned your mind to since these fires,
24physically, it is usual for the bureau to receive a faxed
25request from an incident control centre for these spot fire
26forecasts?---That is how it works.
27That is a faxed piece of paper with fields written in usually by
28hand?---Yes, with position et cetera.
29To reduce the time that it would take for the bureau to respond
30to those faxed requests, you have looked at the possibility
31of having them produced on a website so that you can simply
32(7) 771 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1copy the data on the form straight into the form that you
2are sending back again?---Yes, that would improve
3efficiency quite a bit.
4Those sort of measures are things that the bureau is turning its
5mind to reduce the turnaround time for those spot weather
6forecasts?---That's correct, that is something we have to
7work through with the agencies. I believe that is the way
8it is done in the United States and I think that is
9something we should move towards but we also are using
10technology which will help us to populate the fields in
11those forms with pretty good first estimates just to try to
12speed the process up a bit. We started doing that this
13year and we hope to refine it next year.
14What it would mean that the incident controller would have to
15have access to the computers so they could send you the
16information by computer rather than fax machine?---Anything
17that is in a computer generated form is a lot easier to
18deal with.
19You were then asked about the convection columns and the
20incidents of pyrocumulo-nimbus. The fire weather warnings
21you provided with the IECC and these, for the Commission's
22reference, are reproduced on 5 February at page 145 of the
23report, on 6 February at page 165 and on 7 February at 197.
24Each of those refers under the heading of lightning to the
25possibility of pyrocumulo-nimbus effects. There was one
26there, I think.
27181 is the witness number and that is at page 165 of the report.
28If we can bring that one up. Under the heading,
29"Lightning", there, which is on the left-hand side, the
30notation is and this one is for, issued on, it looks like 6
31February. Under, "Lightning" on the left-hand side you
32(7) 772 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1have got, "Unlikely, low probability, less 5 percent with
2change and possible with any fire induced pyrocumulus.
3So certainly the bureau is discussing with the first agencies
4days ahead the possibility of this fire activity, weather
5activity?---Could possibly produce pyrocumulus, yes.
6If we could look at the Kilmore spot fire forecast at page 224,
7just to go back to the questions I asked you about these
8forms, spot fire weather forecast, page 240 is the witness
9statement number or page 224 of the report. Do you have
10your page open there, Dr Williams?---The spot fire
11forecast.
12At page 224?---Yes.
13For Kilmore?---The page numbering is slightly different on mine.
14The time of the forecast is 5.37 p.m.?---Yes, I have got it.
15You have see under, "Weather overview": "Strong and squally
16north to northwesterly wind will shift cooler south to
17southwesterly this evening between 6.30 and 7 p.m." That
18was specific information you were providing to the incident
19controllers at approximately 5.37 p.m. that
20evening?---That's right.
21You will see under the heading, "Assumptions and uncertainties"
22further down that page, you report the change has
23accelerated into Central Victoria driven in part by
24convection near the developing frontal boundary"?---That's
25right.
26That was the information you gave to the agencies at 5.37 or at
27least the controller at that site?---Yes.
28MS RICHARDS: I have nothing in re-examination.
29MR LIVERMORE: Mr Chairman, just while there is a gap, I have
30the document the subject of the call this morning, that is
31the letter from the Minister for Police and Emergency
32(7) 773 WILLIAMS XXN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Services dated 30 April 2009 and it is the letter
2evidencing an interim review of the State Emergency
3Response Plan to be completed by the end of September 2009
4so I can tender that letter. I have provided copies to
5council assisting.
6CHAIRMAN: Thank you.
7MR RUSH: I call Mrs Joan Davey.
8JOAN FRANCES DAVEY, sworn and examined:
9MR RUSH: Mrs Davey, is your name Joan Frances Davey?---Yes,
10that's correct.
11You live at [...] Warrnambool?---I do, yes.
12Mrs Davey, you are the mother of Robert Davey, the mother-in-law
13of Natasha Davey?---Yes, that's true.
14And grandmother to Georgia Davey who was three years old and
15baby Alexis, three months old, who died in the
16bushfires?---Alexis was eight months.
17I am sorry. Died in the bushfires on 7
18February?---Unfortunately that's true, yes.
19Just in relation to your son, he had set up and established his
20own business as a wine merchant?---Yes, with the help of
21Natasha, Robert and his wife had established a very
22successful business and well respected in the industry.
23They resided at 15 Bald Spur Road in Kinglake?---That's correct,
24yes.
25Approximately how long had they lived there?---About eight
26years.
27Are you able to describe generally the block, how big it was,
28firstly?---I would say their home was on an acre block, it
29was relatively clear in relation to the area. There was
30some large trees but it was a lawned area and there was no
31undergrowth. It was a large block.
32(7) 774 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1How big, what were the dimensions of the house, how many
2bedrooms in the house?---The house had three bedrooms.
3There was another room used as the business office and
4there were two living areas and a kitchen.
5A bathroom and - - -?---A bathroom and a small ensuite, yes.
6Was the house surrounded by verandah?---Yes, it had a verandah
7that extended perhaps four feet all the way around the
8house.
9In relation to the flooring or the surface of the verandah, what
10was that?---It was concrete tiles with six inch square
11tiles all the way around.
12What about the house itself?---The house was a concrete floor
13which had slate tiles in the living area and wet areas and
14was carpeted.
15In relation to the construction of the house or what it was made
16of?---It was cedar shingle with a tinned roof.
17Had your son and daughter-in-law done a fair bit of work to the
18house over the years?---Yes, the house was not, was in a
19semi-dilapidated condition when it was purchased and with
20the help of two sets of grandparents it was lovingly
21restored to a very comfortable, very happy home, yes.
22Just asking you a little bit about the surrounds?---Yes.
23Was there a lawn around the house?---Yes, there was.
24What was it like, was it a lawn in summer or green in
25summer?---Some grasses do very well in summer, yes, but
26there were areas of it down the front of the block that
27were not, that went back to brown grass, yes.
28Just in general terms, how far away from the sides of the house
29did the lawn extend?---At one point, perhaps five metres.
30Other points, because the house was sited on an angle it
31was close, there wasn't much lawn on one side but up to 20
32(7) 775 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1metres of lawn all the way around. Towards the front, it
2extended much further, yes.
3What about water, were there water tanks?---Yes, there was
4originally an underground water tank that sufficed them for
5many years. In later years with the help of Natasha's
6parents they extended their amount of tanks and they ended
7up with three above ground as well as the underground tank,
8yes.
9In relation to - was there a generator as well?---Yes. Not at
10first, but Robert did acquire equipment. He had a
11generator, yes.
12Was there a water pump?---Yes, he had a five horse power petrol
13pump.
14In relation to hoses and the like attached to the tanks, what
15was the position there?---There were two fire fighting
16hoses extending the length of the house on either side
17attached to tanks. There was also a smaller tank and a
18hose as well.
19In addition to that, as of February of 2009, was there a
20sprinkler system established at the house?---Yes, Robert
21had just completed installing underground poly pipe and
22with attached sprinklers that would cover all corners of
23the house, yes.
24Those sprinklers, were they very far away from the house?---No,
25I would say they were only perhaps a metre from the house.
26There may have been, I believe, some on the fence line as
27well but I am not a hundred percent sure on the fence line
28ones.
29We have Google earth map. Their house was getting close to the
30top of the ridge?---The very top of the ridge, yes. You
31can see there that it is sited on the block on an angle.
32(7) 776 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Yes. So we see the tin roof there close to where the cursor
2is?---To the right there, there was a small garage, yes.
3You also have produced some photographs. Before I go to that,
4Commissioners, if I may tender the statements of Mrs Davey.
5They are at tab 34, volume 24. It is the number commencing
6WIT.019.001.0001 and there are two statements, one which is
7dated 18 May 2009 and also a statement taken by police
8which is dated 23 February 2009 and I tender those
9statements with attachments.
10#EXHIBIT 23 - Statements of Joan Davey.
11MR RUSH: The first photograph, Mrs Davey, which is at 0020. It
12is a little bit out of sequence but we will have a look at
13that one now. Is that a photograph that Robert sent to
14you?---Yes.
15By telephone?---By telephone, yes.
16Do you remember the time that he sent that?---It was about a
17little after 3, I believe, although if I may say, I didn't
18receive it at that time.
19Did you want to explain that?---It was, it came to my phone and
20I didn't have my phone with me at the time and therefore I
21didn't see it until about a week later about four or five
22days later that I used my phone.
23Are you able to say where that is taken from the property?---I
24believe it is taken from the property. On the lawn area,
25on the side, from the side of the house, on the north side
26I would say, yes. It came with the text, "Looking up".
27Perhaps if we can go to 0020. I might move on and come back to
28the photographs. We will have a look at this perhaps a bit
29later as well. I don't think it can be brought up
30immediately. You have mentioned that you visited the
31family home?---Yes.
32(7) 777 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Were you in fact due to go there on 7 February?---Yes. My
2husband and I had planned to spend some time down there,
3leaving home on the Saturday and we would have been there,
4yes.
5Because of other grandchild commitments?---Yes, I have another
6grandchild who arrived unexpectedly so I phoned Rob to say
7we would travel to Kinglake on the Sunday evening and stay
8the week. He said, "That's good, we will go out during the
9week and that will be all sweet".
10On the occasions that you had been to the home previously, had
11you made any observations of whether there was a fire plan
12on the wall or somewhere?---Above the telephone in the
13family room, yes, there was a fire plan.
14Did you ever read it or make any observations of it?---I knew
15that it was there and, I didn't really read it, to my
16regret, because I thought in my mind I knew what they were
17going to do.
18When you say that, what did you, in your mind, think they were
19going to do?---From the days when they first purchased the
20property, I mentioned this, you know, situation and I just
21said the one word, I said, "fires" and he said to me, "We
22will be long gone. Once there is a fire, we will be gone"
23and I took that to mean they didn't intend to try and fight
24for the house, that their lives were important, yes.
25Back in 2006 had you been with Rob and Natasha in Perth when
26fires were threatening the Kinglake area?---Yes, that did
27happen. We were over on a business trip with Robert and
28Natasha and we got word of a fire at Kinglake and I said to
29them, "Do you want to return home?" And Rob said, "No, we
30are here. The pets", they had a number of dogs were in
31kennels, and the house was insured and "we could do with
32(7) 778 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1new bathrooms" so he wasn't perturbed about the house.
2Had you seen, since 7 February, a community fire guard list for
3participating residents in the area in which Robert and
4Natasha lived?---Yes, since the fires, I had been searching
5for answers and reasons and during that I was in
6communication with Robert and Natasha's friends from
7Kinglake. I had been aware that in recent years they had
8participated in CFA community meetings and I was quite
9happy that they were being involved in the community but on
10reading that current - the last fire group notes, I was
11quite alarmed to see that it said stay. There was, I
12think, 23 names, 23 families there and there was also a CFA
13officer's name from the Yarra Valley. It had names,
14addresses, number of people in the house and what fire
15equipment they had and their intentions. It was that which
16dismayed me because I had been speaking to Natasha on the
17day and from our previous conversations over the years I
18had believed it was their intention to mainly protect their
19lives and that they had fire equipment, acquired fire
20equipment mainly since attending these meetings.
21In relation to the Bald Spur fire guard contact list, you say
22that you were concerned that it said stay?---Yes.
23There is a column, and I am referring to 0034, Commissioners,
24there is a column at the end of that list which indicates
25staying and there is a yes or no option in relation to it
26and in relation to staying, for Robert and Natasha, it said
27yes?---Yes.
28As in stay?---The explanation of the people surviving who also
29said they were going to stay gave me information that they
30intended to stay until they received information on the
31conduct of fires, if there were any, in their area.
32(7) 779 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Did you have a conversation during the course of 7 February with
2Natasha?---I did.
3How did that come about?---We phoned on a regular basis and on
4this particular day, I had phoned, I had heard a radio
5report of a fire at a town that I recognised, the name of a
6town. Warrnambool is quite some four hours away from
7Kinglake and when we visited we went to their house and
8sort of only had cursory information on the surrounding
9areas but I recognised a name of a near by - - -
10Do you recall what the name was?---Wandong.
11I said to Natasha, "There a fire near you". She said, "It is
12miles away, mum, it is 50 degrees outside, it is 20 degrees
13in the house. Robert is outside preparing and priming the
14pump. The girls are very happy inside". I could hear
15Georgia singing the Wiggles song and Natasha said, "It is
1650 degrees, Georgia doesn't like the heat. We could get
17caught in a traffic jam. We could drive into a fire. We
18will stay here until we get information." I hung up
19believing that she was happy, they were making their
20preparations and they were confident that it was a normal
21day for them.
22When you spoke to her, did you get an understanding as to
23whether she was on the computer?---Yes, she was working.
24She was working on the computer and she said, "I have the
25CFA window open and I am watching for information. Rob's
26outside, he has the radio on outside and he is wetting down
27and making sure everything is in working order. He was
28putting mops and buckets as well along the boundary of the
29house." I just assumed that they were having their normal
30day. It was very hot, it had been hot up there for some
31eight or nine days previously and they believed - I
32(7) 780 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1believed they were having a normal day and being alert.
2Did you have any other communication on 7 February?---No. We
3talked for a while about the children, it was just that one
4phone call. I will regret forever that I missed the
5photographic message that Robert sent to me because I had
6taken my grandson to the beach and I had spent the day at
7the beach at Warrnambool and I just missed it and I regret
8that.
9Did you try to ring a little bit later in the day?---Yes, yes,
10on returning home from the beach, I had heard another news
11report. I was listening to our local station 882 3YB it
12had a relayed news broadcast from Melbourne and it
13mentioned a town, Flowerdale, I believe and I knew that,
14that seemed to me to be closer so I sort of hurried home
15and I tried to made a call but there was no response. The
16phone just didn't answer and I thought, "Oh well, lines are
17have dropped out or something". That was about, I suppose,
186.15, 6.30. I then proceeded to get dinner for the guys at
19home and normal activities. I periodically phoned Robert's
20mobile phone and received his answering machine which made
21me think they were busy and I just continued until I had
22got my grandson to bed and then turned on the computer and
23went to the CFA website for information.
24After making that initial phone call, is there normally an
25answering machine?---Yes, there is normally an answering
26machine.
27You tried on the mobile phone?---I tried on the mobile phone and
28I was getting the answering machine which I must explain I
29am not familiar with mobile phones and I thought that
30answering on a mobile would be the same as a house phone,
31you know, that it would be that the phone was there and it
32(7) 781 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1would answer, I wasn't up with this message bank and I was
2quite reassured that if the phone is okay, Robert will be
3okay because he was never away from it.
4Were you on any websites trying to find out what went on?---Yes,
5I was flicking between CFA and because the radio that my
6husband was listening to was giving also a number for the
7Red Cross, so I flicked between CFA and Red Cross and my
8husband was listening to the radio and the website was -
9didn't seem to change until about, I think it was about 10
10o'clock I noticed the first fire at Kinglake and we were
11becoming increasingly more alarmed as time went on because
12we couldn't get any answers and we were phoning those
13advertised numbers, the emergency numbers that were - - -
14Was that the Victorian bushfire line?---Yes, the bushfire
15information line and there was also the Red Cross line for
16information that was being broadcast. We phoned those
17numbers continually and in actual fact we phoned those
18numbers until 12 o'clock the next day and not one of our
19calls were answered.
20Did you actually hang on for quite - - -?---I actually got a
21voice, a computerised voice message that my call was
22important and that I should hang on so I held that line
23simply because it was something, for almost two hours and
24the call was never answered.
25Do you remember which line?---It was the bushfire emergency
26line.
27Without any information coming through?---No, no information
28except more anxiety because by then I think I noticed there
29were four fires at Kinglake and they said small fires and
30then they said - there was one that said a grass fire in
31Bald Spur Road which spun me out completely because I am
32(7) 782 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1aware that there are houses in Bald Spur Road and there is
2bush at the side. There is no grass in Kinglake and if you
3have got a fire in Kinglake you need - you need to get the
4heck out of there or you need somebody to put it out,
5neither of which happened apparently.
6What did you do on Sunday?---We drove, after observing
7television, the radio, computer, and the phone and getting
8no assistance except more anxious and more frustrated we
9then, in the morning, drove to Melbourne via a niece at
10Werribee, we stopped there for a moment but I was too
11anxious to stop so we continued on to Whittlesea where we
12registered the children as missing and I wrote on notes,
13sticker notes and put them on a board, messages that, you
14know, "Davey family, please contact us" and "Rob, where are
15you" and "if anybody knows where Rob and Tash are", I wrote
16our phone number on, I just sat there writing number, help,
17and becoming increasingly more distressed because there was
18no answers to anything.
19Did you in fact go to Morang South at one stage?---After we had
20registered we moved about Whittlesea to wherever we saw
21anyone congregated. We went to CFA where we saw the trucks
22and the orange uniforms. That was just an action point and
23we went to the police station. We were reassured by one
24police officer that the children's car wasn't one of the
25ones on the road that had been crashed so it became my
26mindset that they have made it out and they are at, there
27was an oval, maybe at North Kinglake. I remember Robert
28saying there is an oval near by and that would have been
29one of the places they would have headed to if they needed
30to get out and could go that way. If they needed to get
31and couldn't go that way they would have gone to Diamond
32(7) 783 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Creek. During the evening and the next day we travelled to
2each of those places looking for information. The police
3officer said she believed there would be a convoy of
4evacuees from the mountain that would be coming down.
5There would be 150 cars and busloads of people. So we
6started to calm down thinking they have made it there, and
7time was getting on, that is getting towards late in the
8evening. We had been to South Morang and back, we had been
9all over the area just driving and looking and searching
10for information and it was not until we heard about that
11convoy that we sort of started to relax a little. We
12returned to the Whittlesea Red Cross centre and from there,
13and during the day we had been phoning, continually phoning
14Robert's phone. I had given up on the house phone, and
15phoning Natasha's parents to get any information that they
16may have had and to keep them updated where we were and
17none of it was working and it was getting late so we sort
18of settled at the Whittlesea centre waiting for this convoy
19to happen and were quite devastated to hear that it had
20been and dispersed and our children weren't anywhere to be
21found. That was, I think we are getting towards 8, 8.30
22and at that time I was beginning to realise that maybe I
23wouldn't find them. So it was just a matter of settling in
24at Whittlesea and waiting for the morning. They announced
25there would be a meeting, an information meeting next
26morning. Natasha's parents joined us but I had been
27walking around the shelter and I remember standing beside a
28gentleman as Brian Naylor's death and loss had been
29announced and the gentleman beside me said, "Oh my God, if
30he's gone, they will all be dead up there". I said, "What
31do you mean?" And he said to me that, to the effect that
32(7) 784 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Mr Naylor's property was eminently prepared and eminently
2enforced to fight anything and if he hadn't been able to
3fight the fire with his equipment he didn't believe that
4anybody else would have been able to fight such a fire. So
5reality was beginning to bite, I am afraid.
6Can we go back a little bit and have a look at some of the
7photographs?---That is the family home at the back area of
8the house. That is prior to the tanks, the extra tanks
9were fitted on the opposite corner. You can see there the
10portable tank.
11That could be moved around?---That would be moved when it was
12empty but you can see how green the grass was there and it
13was a large lawn area and sparsely treed but you can also
14see the house is constructed with a tin roof and cedar
15shingles and cedar poles.
16Perhaps if we can have a look at 21?---Shows the neighbour's
17property which had a border of bush line.
18That is the back of the photograph?---Yes.
19And it shows the green lawn area and to the left behind the
20fence are dog yards.
21So the boundary of the house isn't where that fence is?---No, it
22is some perhaps five metres past that or three to five
23metres past that but the line of trees, there was a fence
24at the boundary and they were the neighbour's trees, yes.
25Next photograph?---That is looking from that area where we were
26photographed back the other way.
27So that looks back over the road, does it?---No, that looks
28east. You can see there that Robert and Natasha's house
29was at the highest point of Kinglake, they were right on
30the top of the mountain. You travelled down the road to go
31into the village, yes.
32(7) 785 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1There are some more photos that we might have a look at. That
2is a photograph of the house, obviously?---Yes, that is the
3photograph of the house, looking at the front from the
4west, yes.
5The next one 0024?---You can see, that is the house from the
6west side, is it?
7In the front is the ride-on mower?---That is from the south side
8and that looks - see the tall thing at the back is the
9water cylinder and looking through there you can see the
10neighbouring properties are all destroyed as well.
11The next photograph at 0025?---That is the five horse power
12petrol pump that was apparently equivalent to a water
13pistol in the conditions.
14The next photograph is one of the tanks?---The tanks, yes.
15There were two tanks there, the other one is completely
16destroyed and they were connected to pumps. I think you
17can just see the pump at the corner there where the bit of
18spouting has fallen. They were connected and in the "on"
19position.
200027?---My son's vehicle.
210028?---That is the hose that was connected to the pump and it
22is in the "on" position.
23And then at 0029?---That shows one of the sprinklers set in the
24corner close to the house. I believe the car removal
25people broke the top off it.
260030?---That is remains of the portable tank we were looking at
27before.
28Were the family found in the bathroom?---The family were found
29sheltering in the bathroom, yes.
30And perhaps while we are looking at these matters, if you can
31just bring up 0034.
32(7) 786 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Just while that is coming up, Mrs Davey, during the
2course of your evidence you mentioned an oval and perhaps
3there may have been a desire to move to an oval; had that
4been discussed with you?---It was some years prior; it was
5just in our discussions of, you know, how would you manage
6if there was a fire and he said, well, he expected that he
7would find out a fire was coming their way. As I
8understand it, in the '06 fire at Kinglake when we were
9away, the fire truck travelled up and down the streets with
10a siren and a loudspeaker alerting people to follow the
11truck out if you wished to get out or activate your plan.
12That is the information since the incident that has been
13given to me by survivors and people who live in the area.
14I think we might leave the screen for the moment. Mrs Davey,
15there are some matters you wanted to particularly raise
16with the Royal Commissioners and I know one of them
17concerned prediction of fire?---Yes. Yes, I do. The
18families are all very grateful to CFA volunteers and all
19volunteers, but I just wonder how a fire that is never ever
20under control and burning towards a populated area - I
21understand the CFA didn't put their trucks on that side and
22yet the people, the residents who were in that fire path
23were - I believe from speaking to my children about their
24communication with the CFA, that they expected, they
25expected that CFA screen to say a warning, and that is why
26they felt they were comfortable in their home, they were
27safe, they felt safe and they were watching for this.
28Whether that was agreed in their meetings - I believe it
29was. They were active in communicating with people in the
30area and what they would do and I believe that the people
31on Bald Spur Road had an expectation of survival that was
32(7) 787 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1beyond reality. I think if a CFA person went to that hill
2to convene meetings, they should have realised that Bald
3Spur Road was at the highest point of Kinglake. The street
4consisted of homes built of combustible material. Our
5house was cedar. It was like having a house in a
6fireplace. Yet they were encouraged to establish fireguard
7equipment that ... unless the fire started and their
8property was virtually worthless, somebody should have
9recognised that Bald Spur Road was indefensible, totally
10indefensible, and should have been - the activity of that
11fire group to establish evacuation or warning systems that
12would get people out of that street. Thank you.
13One other matter that you raised in the submission that you
14indicated you might like to raise is in relation to houses
15and the protection that houses give people?---Yes. I
16believe that at those meetings they were encouraged to save
17their house- people save houses, houses can save people -
18which was not applicable to their - maybe wonderfully
19applicable to open plains and grasslands, but if you have a
20ridge and you have got combustible houses, they ain't going
21to save you, baby. There's nothing - they're not going to
22save you.
23You mentioned roadside vegetation?---I believe a lot of people
24lost their life in that fire trying to escape because the
25Kinglake area is heavily wooded and I would say that in
26order for - if we are going to learn anything from this,
27there must be clear access from people. Roadsides
28shouldn't have trees that have the ability to block them.
29I believe that trees are fine so long as they have not got
30the ability to fall and block a road.
31If I can just go back to one matter?---Yes, thank you.
32(7) 788 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1You mentioned the meetings?---Yes.
2And Robert and Natasha's attendance at the meetings?---Yes.
3I think it is fair to say that you don't know what was said at
4the meetings?---I don't know what was said at the meetings.
5I can only ascertain that their opinions changed of their
6abilities. At first there was no intention of ever
7contesting a fire and I believe with the acquiring of all
8this equipment and the fact that they did die there was
9that they gained false confidence, either in their own
10ability, in the ability of the CFA or the combination of
11both. If there had been a row of CFA trucks on Bald Spur
12Road, everybody would have died there as well. It was
13simply an indefensible street in a fire situation. And
14prior to the activity with the CFA, our children were of a
15mind to leave and we will lament forever that our children
16interacted with the CFA fireguard group.
17Just looking at that (it has come up), that's the Bald Spur Road
18fireguard group?---And their contact numbers.
19They are the third people mentioned?---Yes.
20And it notes, going across the page there, the number of adults,
21the number of children?---Yes.
22It says four dogs; was that about right?---Unfortunately they
23lost two dogs in close succession prior to the fires, one
24from old age, one for another reason, yes.
25Then it sets out the special remarks - generator fire pump,
26hoses on all three tanks?---Yes.
27And there were, as you have indicated, and we have seen
28sprinklers as well?---Yes, the sprinklers are a later
29addition, yes.
30In relation to them on that list in relation to staying, it says
31yes?---Yes, it does, as it does with a large number of the
32(7) 789 DAVEY XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1other people; and I might note that fifteen of them are
2also deceased from that street.
3Thank you.
4MR CLELLAND: No questions, Mr Chairman.
5CHAIRMAN: Thank you very much indeed. I understand it would
6have been a very difficult experience, but thank you for
7putting yourself through it.
8COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Can I add my thanks. It is an act of
9great courage that you have come forward to share your
10story. Thank you?---I have complete confidence that we
11will get a result and I have to assure you that I will be
12following up that your recommendations are not ignored.
13Believe me. Thank you.
14CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Mrs Davey.
15(THE WITNESS WITHDREW)
16MR RUSH: Call Mr Griffiths.
17ANTHONY STEPHEN GRIFFITHS, sworn and examined:
18CHAIRMAN: Please take a seat and make yourself as comfortable
19as you can in the circumstances.
20MR RUSH: Mr Griffiths, is your name Anthony Griffiths?---That's
21right.
22Do you work from the Department of Sustainability and
23Environment at 8 Nicholson Street in East Melbourne?---Yes.
24There are you the acting manager of fire and the information
25group?---That's right, fire information and assistance
26group.
27Can you indicate to the Commissioners just what that management
28role encompasses?---Yes. We have a number of business
29information systems that comprise of a web portal called
30FireWeb, an incident resource information system called
31IRIS and a web mapping system called Firemap.
32(7) 790 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1Mr Griffiths, have you prepared a statement with a number of
2attachments for the purposes of explaining what you do,
3which, Commissioners, is at 23, tab 17, and the first page
4it WIT.018.001.0001?---Yes.
5And the contents of the statement are true and correct?---Yes,
6correct.
7I tender the statement with its attachments.
8#EXHIBIT 24 - Statement of Mr A Griffiths with attachments.
9Mr Griffiths, you mentioned as a starting point FireWeb. Can
10you explain to us what FireWeb as run through the DSE is
11and in very brief terms because we'll come to it in some
12detail, just an overview of it?---Sure. The whole purpose
13of FireWeb is to have it as our primary source of
14integrated fire information so a lot of other systems are
15made available via FireWeb and all our information
16resources and incident information, for example, is stored,
17is accessible via FireWeb.
18You mentioned the word integrated there. Is it integrated in
19the sense of integrating all the various sources and
20information streams within DSE or is it integrated with
21CFA?---It is integrated sometimes with CFA. For example,
22we exchange our incident lists every 15 minutes between
23organisations and they are automated to upload into the web
24browser every 15 minutes.
25I am going to have to ask you to try and keep your voice up a
26little bit?---Okay.
27So you say there is an exchange, an automatic exchange every 15
28minutes, between what?---Between the CFA system and
29ourselves who are managing the FireWeb system.
30Are they different systems or the same type of system?---They
31are different platforms. I don't know a lot of detail
32(7) 791 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1about the CFA system.
2Just to go over some qualifications of yours, Mr Griffiths. Are
3you an accredited air observer and an infrared
4operator?---Correct.
5And you have been a member of the Australasian Fire and
6Emergency Services Authorities Council in relation to
7particularly its data management group?---That's correct.
8And the FireWeb system is internet-based?---Yes, it is available
9via a web browser.
10And is it available to the public or is there parts available to
11the public and parts only to DSE?---That's correct. A lot
12of incident detail is stored in FireWeb and we summarise
13that information to place on the external web for
14information that is available to the public.
15In your statement you refer to something which you have
16described as State Map?---Yes.
17Is State Map capable of being brought up on the screen?---It is,
18but it is going to take me a few minutes to log in and to
19get it up.
20Okay. Perhaps if you could do that?---We seem to be having a
21bit of a problem with our external access.
22I think it is me, Mr Griffiths?---I might just try again.
23I don't know whether the Commissioners intend taking a break
24this afternoon.
25CHAIRMAN: If it is sensible to take one on account of
26technological problems, we will take it now.
27MR RUSH: I think it might be, sir.
28(Short adjournment)
29ANTHONY STEPHEN GRIFFITHS, recalled:
30MR RUSH: Thank you, Commissioners. Mr Griffiths, what has come
31up on the screen is State Map, but there is a lot more to
32(7) 792 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1it than that, I take it. Can I firstly ask you, on that
2map are you able to put up on the screen as they might
3develop incidents in relation to fire?---That's right; and
4the purpose of this screen is an overview of the state. As
5fires are reported, the icons that we can see on the map
6there (I will just scroll down a bit to the status), you
7can see that we have three controlled fires across the
8state.
9What you are showing is three controlled fires in the state at
10the moment?---Yes.
11Are they controlled burn fires?---They are wildfires.
12And the information that comes up, if we log into, say, the one
13at Cann River, if you click on that, what are we seeing
14there?---By placing my mouse over the icon, I get some
15basic detail about that fire. If I like to review the fire
16report, I can click on that and it will bring up the fire
17report. Is that what you would like to see?
18Yes, thank you. That says the last report was
1920 April?---That's right. That is relating to the latest
20situation report. I believe that is so. I can scroll down
21and find that information out. That appears to be the
22case.
23So what are we looking at there?---What we are looking at is the
24incident summary. We are not getting a whole lot of
25resolution on the screen so it is not showing a great deal.
26So details about the fire, the status, the potential of it,
27the location of the origin, details about our initial
28response to the fire, some fire behaviour information,
29resources that are deployed to it and then some incident
30management details and the attachments such as maps may be
31attached there, there is none at the moment, and then all
32(7) 793 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1the situation reports for the duration of the campaign
2against that fire.
3In relation to an incident such as the Murrindindi fire, how
4would that come to be placed on State Map?---The procedure
5that we have in place is either a district duty officer or
6if an incident management team has been established, they
7will fill out a form, a hardcopy form, and fax it into the
8ECT where a duty officer will enter that into FireWeb. We
9are also trialling direct input into the system from the
10incident management teams themselves. I am not sure about
11who is involved in that, but there is a number of
12participating fire districts.
13I will come to that. When we look at State Map, we have just
14looked at the fire of Cann River, just getting an overview
15of what it offers. Are you also able to look at aircraft
16movements on State Map?---That's right. If I go back to
17State Map, there is a number of tabs there across the top
18of the screen of which are labelled burns, so all our
19prescribed burning.
20Aircraft movement. If I click on aircraft, I will
21see ... there is not a lot of aircraft on contract at the
22moment so there is four aircraft being displayed there.
23They are all yellow; that shows that we haven't received an
24observation from those resources within the last hour.
25So they change colour if you have received an observation from
26the aircraft in the last hour?---That's right, they will
27turn red; a red icon will be displayed.
28And you mentioned before planned burning. Does the State Map
29indicate where planned burning is taking place or where it
30is proposed to be taking place?---Yes. This is our burn
31map at the moment. It is showing all statuses as is down
32(7) 794 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1the bottom there. We also have the feature of being able
2to select whatever status you want displayed. The ignition
3symbols are showing the burns that are being ignited today.
4So when you say ignition signals, they are in red and you are
5pointing there with the cursor?---That's right, to the
6flame symbol.
7COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: Excuse me, can you show those just on one
8day, today for example?---Yes, sure. If I press on just
9ignition and click on update, I just see - - -
10So that is a daily view?---Yes, that's right.
11A current view?---Yes.
12Thank you.
13MR RUSH: What was the other information that was depicted on
14the map? There were lots of dots all over the map?---They
15are different statuses of our prescribed burns, so as a
16prescribed burn is being planned through to being ignited
17and then through to completed and safe status.
18At a later time in the Royal Commission's hearings, but it may
19be relevant to ask you this now, are you able to bring up
20where prescribed burns have taken place, for instance in
21the last 2 or 3 years?---Yes, I can do that, yeah, from our
22fire history database and using our Firemap web service.
23What about weather in relation to State Map?---Yes, we download
24a lot of weather products from the Bureau of Meteorology.
25We also include some products from other sources such as
26Weatherzone and create some ourselves. For instance, we
27have a service of a lightning feed coming from a company
28called GPATS and we produce our own maps of putting their
29lightning observations over a map of Victoria.
30I will have a look at that in a little bit more detail, but just
31in relation to aircraft you say none have reported in the
32(7) 795 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1last hour. Are there GPS tracking devices in the
2aircraft?---Yes, that's right.
3Are you able to track the movements of the aircraft on any
4particular day?---Yes. The interval that is set in each
5aircraft is to send a position between every 60 and 120
6seconds, so we can see where the aircraft are.
7So for rotary-wing aircraft that may be fighting a perimeter of
8a fire, are you able to observe the movements of that
9aircraft?---Yes, at least to, you know, every 2 minutes.
10How is that information used?---It is used in a number of
11different ways, depending on the role you are undertaking
12in the incident management team and, for instance, anyone
13involved in aircraft management may be just viewing that
14the aircraft is still operating and they can see that it is
15moving. And the information that is displayed when you
16hover your mouse over the aircraft indicates the speed and
17direction that the aircraft is moving in.
18Similarly, in relation to tankers or bulldozers that may be used
19by DSE, are you able to track that equipment?---That's
20right. We have had a policy for a while where we have
21fitted the GPS devices to all our track dozers and our fire
22tanker fleet.
23So in relation to that, are you able to follow where a
24containment line might have been attempted or things of a
25similar nature in relation to firefighting capacity?---We
26can certainly imply that. If we speak to the incident
27management team and we are made aware, for example, where a
28bulldozer is involved in construction of a control line, it
29will be sending its position back every 10 minutes and we
30can certainly assume that where it's been is where the
31control line has been constructed.
32(7) 796 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1What we have got up there is weather. Does the weather
2information come to you from the Bureau of
3Meteorology?---That's right. Some weather products and the
4ones within the fire weather area there on the screen are
5principally available to just the fire agencies, so the
6outlook, for example, and significant weather charts, but
7we also get standard weather products such as weather
8observations across the state and in adjoining states.
9So can you show us or demonstrate how ... I will come back to
10what I was going to ask you - will you demonstrate how a
11person, using this tool, might be able to go to a
12particular area, let's say Kilmore, and find out what the
13weather is in Kilmore?---Sure. I will show you the
14observation maps. We have got an observation map here of
15Victoria which shows the current observation from the
16automatic weather stations and the bureau create this
17product and make it available to DSE via their file
18transfer site.
19So what are we looking at on that map?---So this is showing -
20let's have a look - it has got relative humidity in the
21actual values there and it is showing wind direction and
22speed and temperature in the colour as well, so we can see
23there the black areas are below 15°, the blue, 15 to 20,
24and the green, 15 to 25.
25If we wanted to look at a specific site in relation to
26weather?---If we want to inquire of a specific site, we can
27go back to State Map and choose the weather tab and we get
28a view of all the automatic weather stations across the
29state. Also if we deploy a portable automatic weather
30station, that will appear on the State Map as well and
31something close to Kilmore is Redesdale and so we hover our
32(7) 797 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1mouse over it and find out the detail about that station.
2So that is the current weather position for Redesdale as of 3.45
3today?---The current time on there is 1530. I think they
4report every 30 minutes.
5Mr Griffiths, in relation to this information on a day like
67 February, who is it available to?---It is available to
7all of DSE and its now partners and also we provide access
8into the CFA network as well.
9I think you say in your statement that you were in effect
10seconded to the IECC for the fire season?---Yeah, we can
11volunteer to fulfil a fire role within the IECC and within
12incident management teams.
13What was your role this fire season?---One of the roles was fire
14systems support duty officer, which I undertook quite a
15lot.
16And so within the IECC this information is available by anyone
17who wants to access it through the DSE system using the
18web?---Correct.
19But for the public, is this sort of information available or is
20it more limited?---It is more limited. We show the
21location of fires and the prescribed burning and we also
22put updates, fire updates, on the external web.
23What the Commission has heard over the course of its hearings is
24that there may be a fire over which DSE is the controller
25and a fire over which CFA is the controller. This is the
26DSE website. How does a CFA fire get into this information
27stream if it does?---My understanding is if it is a CFA
28incident where there is no DSE personnel involved, it
29possibly won't get put into our system because it is
30managed solely by the other organisation. In a joint
31managed incident, it will appear in our system and in the
32(7) 798 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1CFA system.
2And you, as you have indicated, can't comment or are not aware
3of whether CFA have a similar capacity - as we are looking
4at your DSEs, whether CFA have this similar capacity?---I
5am aware they have an incident management system, but I am
6not aware of any other detail of it. I am assuming they do
7have a fire reporting system.
8Can I ask you this, then. If there is a CFA controlled fire,
9how does that get onto the DSE website which is available
10to the public; and vice versa, how does a DSE fire which is
11controlled by the DSE get onto the CFA website which is
12accessible to the public?---That is getting into an area
13where I'm not really qualified. You know, I don't work in
14any roles that exchange information between organisations.
15The decision would be made by other roles.
16Then I take it you can only say what gets onto the DSE
17website?---Yes, that's what I can see.
18And you have expressed the view that you are in some doubt as to
19whether a CFA controlled fire may make it onto the DSE
20website?---If I can take you to the fires page, our fire
21reporting page, I indicated before that we exchange fire
22information every 15 minutes. I have got a link there that
23shows the list that the CFA have just sent to us, so we can
24see there that it is dated 1545, today's date and that's
25the list of CFA incidents at the moment.
26So that is updated every 15 minutes?---That's right.
27And does that go on to your map?---No, not necessarily.
28And does it go onto the map that is available to the
29public?---No. We don't have any - there's no location
30information in the detail that they send to us.
31Are you able to bring up past fire events on the screen?
32(7) 799 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1---That's right, yes.
2So if we wanted to go and have a look at the Murrindindi fire or
3the Beechworth fire or a linescan that was taken on
47 February, it is capable of - it is kept in the history,
5if you like, of this system?---That's right. All that
6information is stored for later use and possible use by
7wildfire investigators, for example.
8Before I ask you to move there, the weather bureau, just
9finishing off on the weather, I think you have indicated
10that is automatically fed through to your system from the
11weather bureau?---The weather bureau places it on their
12file transfer site and yes, we have an automatic job that
13looks at that site, so every - I'm not sure what the
14interval is, it might be every ten minutes and downloads
15new weather products that are placed there.
16Can I ask you some questions about how an incident is
17reported?---Sure.
18For it to appear on State Map as a fire incident, what is the
19mechanism of reporting?---As I understand it, the procedure
20is once a fire is reported to DSE, within 15 minutes a fire
21report should be submitted.
22And what is the fire report and who submits it?---If the fire is
23reported to a local fire district, then the district duty
24officer will either fill out the hardcopy form and fax that
25into the integrated emergency coordination centre, or if
26they have been trained and they have the correct
27registration, they can do it themselves.
28So they can either fax it through - to where?---To the IECC.
29Or if they have been trained, they can go direct into the system
30and put it on the system themselves?---Correct.
31That takes place at the incident control centre that is a DSE
32(7) 800 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1incident control centre?---Yes, it can be an incident
2control centre or if an incident management team hasn't
3been set up yet, it would be the district duty officer that
4would be undertaking that task.
5Then once it is on the system as an incident, how is the fire
6mapped, how does DSE keep track of the fire?---As incident
7information becomes available it will be - it is the
8responsibility of the planning section within an incident
9management team, and information can be collected by roles
10such as an air observer and a ground observer, and that
11information passed on back to the incident management team
12and the mapping officer can interpret that information and
13create a map.
14So is that information interpreted by the incident control
15centre, or is it interpreted and placed in the system at
16the IECC?---It can be done at either, but in the IECC we do
17have mapping experts as part of my team, and if the
18incident is in the progress of being established, or the
19incident management team being established, then we can
20assist while it is being established by helping out with
21some mapping services.
22You indicated in answer to that question that you have a team of
23experts in relation to mapping at the IECC. Having regard
24to your answer that that is done at the incident control
25centre - that mapping, once established, what is the role
26of the expert mappers at the IECC over the course of a day
27like the 7th February?---Like the 7th February, they may
28need to create products for the IECC itself, or they are
29there to support the incident management teams.
30So what sort of products are created for the IECC itself?---It
31may be the statewide overview map, which is one of the
32(7) 801 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1standard products that can be produced from the Firemap. I
2haven't worked in the mapping unit this summer, so I am
3unaware of any other product.
4Can I ask you about linescan, and it is a qualification that you
5have. Are you able to produce for us from the data on the
6system the linescan that was taken of the East Kilmore fire
7at 12.33 on 7 February?---Sure, I can do that, yes. I will
8just open up our Firemap site and I will zoom in to that
9area. Okay, so I've loaded there a scan from the 7th
10of February, and I can only display one at a time but that
11is looking like - actually, I've made a mistake, that was
12from the 8th. I can load from the 7th at 12.33. Just a
13moment. Thank you. That has loaded the scan. If I zoom
14in further I will start to see some more detail.
15Firstly, perhaps you can explain it to us. We see the
16semi-cigar shape in red, and then behind it what looks like
17red and white dots. You are experienced as a linescan
18operator, are you able to describe what is depicted
19there?---That's right, it is an infrared image. Infrared
20is able to see through smoke. When an infrared image is
21showing colours that are dark as cool surface temperature,
22through to colours that are very hot, as white on the
23screen, and we also are able within our firescan system to
24set a threshold where temperatures over a certain threshold
25that we set, and, for example, 70 degrees celsius will be
26colourised, and that is the red area that we can see in the
27centre of the screen, and that's the active area of the
28fire at the moment.
29So the red area is the active area of the fire, and then back
30towards the right in Kilmore East there appear to be some
31areas of red and what looks like white?---That's right. So
32(7) 802 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1looking at that, the fire has started from the north and
2has travelled in a southerly direction.
3That is taken by an aircraft?---Yes.
4From an aircraft?---Yes, that's right. Our firescan system
5comprises of equipment fitted in the aircraft. As the
6aircraft moves forward and we turn on the scanner, it scans
7left and right as it passes over the landscape, and we
8create two products, a QuickPrint, which is being created
9as it flies, and once the scan is completed, we create a
10georectified image, where the location of the scan is
11corrected so that it can be automatically loaded within web
12mapping applications like Firemap.
13For the QuickPrint, how long does that take, once you have
14scanned the fire?---I believe it is being created as the
15data is being captured. So, it is available in A4 sheets,
16and as there is enough data available for one A4 sheet, it
17will create that A4 product and then start creating p.2.
18In general terms, if I was to ask for a QuickPrint of the 12.33
19linescan, how long would it take to produce it?---From when
20the scan starts, probably up to five minutes.
21In relation to what you called the georectified image, how long
22does that take?---An additional five minutes, say ten
23minutes.
24Is that transmitted from the aircraft?---Yes, that's right. We
25have a network of downlink sites across Victoria and once
26we are in range of one of those downlink sites, we are able
27to transmit the products into our network and make them
28available on our systems.
29So, again, in general terms for the QuickPrint and then the
30georectified image, can it be anticipated that such imagery
31will be made available within 10 or 15 minutes of the
32(7) 803 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1linescan taking place?---Correct.
2Who receives that imagery on a day like the 7th February?---We
3have a part of FireWeb that is a firescan request page, so
4planning officers within the incident management teams can
5actually place a request. That request is then managed by
6the State Aircraft Unit who will create a mission and put
7staff to actually go and capture that information, and then
8once it is scanned it will be transmitted back into our
9systems, and the planning officer will then go to a similar
10page where that information is delivered, or it comes
11straight into Firemap and they can view it.
12Within the IECC, once created the QuickPrint and the
13georectified image, who takes control of it in the
14IECC?---I don't think anyone takes control of it, but it is
15available for everyone to view.
16How is it available for everyone to view?---Meaning I'm able to
17view it in Firemap. Everyone else that can access Firemap
18that's on our network, or the NEO network or the CFA
19network can view it the same way.
20In relation to the integrated emergency centre, coordination
21centre, does it only appear on the DSE website, something
22like this, or will it appear on the CFA as well?---It
23appears within the CFA network as well, and the CFA prior
24to this fire season committed to using Firemap for all
25mapping incidents during this season.
26Again, within general terms, accepting that linescan at 12.33,
27one can anticipate that by 12.45 the information on that
28linescan was available at the IECC. What about the
29incident control centre?---They, yes, access the systems
30the same way, it is exactly the same thing, so as soon as
31it is available on the system they will be able to view it
32(7) 804 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1as well.
2Whilst you were bringing up the linescan, I noticed a number of
3information bars in relation to mapping that are available
4for maps. Could you perhaps just quickly detail to the
5Commissioners the availability - what is available, what
6sort of information?---Sure. There's a mixture of static
7information. Static is information that doesn't change
8that often. For example, infrastructure such as location
9of airfields, fire towers and operation points. Vegetation
10information, mainly on public land, which shows, you know,
11the type of vegetation that will affect fire behaviour,
12therefore, that's available there. I will just close that.
13Cultural and heritage feature information. The ability to
14turn on contours and more detailed road network, for
15example. We also include realtime information. For
16example, our resource and aircraft tracking system
17observations can be viewed within Firemap.
18So, just as an example, for 7 February, or some other convenient
19date, are you able to detail to us what aircraft movements
20were over the fire on 7 February?---I can't do it from
21here, because we set up the systems to show current
22information, but I can find that out for you back in the
23office.
24It wasn't done for that purpose, but if we were to look at
25aircraft movements today over this region, are you able to
26bring that up?---Yes, sure. If I can zoom back out to the
27state level and turn on the locations of fixed wing
28aircraft and helicopters, and we get to see a fair bit more
29than the State Map.
30So has there been aircraft movements in and around the Melbourne
31area today?---I can't see any red aircraft on there, so it
32(7) 805 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1doesn't look like there is a lot of movements at the moment
2- within the last hour.
3Are you able to bring up topographical features of particular
4areas on State Map?---On State Map or Firemap?
5On Firemap?---Yes, I am. When I start zooming in I get access
6to more and more detail, and to illustrate that I will just
7zoom in for a while. So I am zoomed in at the moment at a
8scale of 1 as to 338,000. If I zoom in even further I get
9more and more stream work information displayed, for
10example. If I want to turn on some more layers, I choose
11what appears on the map. So I'm seeing local track
12networks and I am zoomed into 1 as to 33,000 now, so it is
13very detailed data.
14Without going into every detail, you are also able to keep track
15of resources on any particular day, and I mean by that,
16tankers, bulldozers and the like?---Yes, that's right.
17Individual tankers and the like?---Yes, if I move back up here
18to the RAAF's folder - I have only turned on helicopters
19and fixed wing aircraft - I can view the locations and
20their trails - where they have been for the day, is what I
21mean by trails. If I turn all those on and zoom back out
22to the state level we get a picture of where our high value
23resources are at the moment. The black lines you can see
24there is where they have travelled during today.
25Can you bring up what you are just pointing to there?---Yes, I
26can zoom in a bit further.
27What are we looking at?---We are possibly looking at here the
28track that the fire spotter 368 there on the screen has
29taken during - earlier today. I am able to find out more
30information by selecting the information icon and clicking
31on it and I can see that the fixed wing aircraft moved at
32(7) 806 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
18.23 am this morning.
2Thank you. I am going to quicken it up a little bit,
3Mr Griffiths. Is there any other feature of this
4particular aspect that you think it is worthwhile taking
5the Commissioners to?---We have been viewing lots of
6information. We also train our mapping officers to be able
7to add incident information into Firemap as well. So we
8have a number of tools across the top of the page here.
9The fire sketcher tools which I am selecting now is
10available to authenticated individuals who have received
11training and are competent in mapping fires.
12In relation to, for example, persons that were working in the
13IECC on 7 February in relation to fire analysis and
14prediction, they can build up maps from this system in
15relation to their work?---That's right. At the moment
16another feature of Firemap, after you collect your data and
17save it within the system, is you can access templates of
18standard maps. At the moment it is a development project
19to add prediction maps in as a standard template. So we
20don't have it at the moment, but we will be working on it.
21What do you mean add them in as a standard template?---Okay. If
22I click on the print icon there, we can see that there's a
23number of standard wildfire map templates, and we talk with
24our operations personnel and figure out what types of maps
25they listen to, what types of map they need, and then
26create a template so that if you are at a fire, for
27instance, in Mildura, and you receive a map, it has exactly
28the same symbology and has the same look and feel as the
29fire you attended in Cann River, for example. So it is
30standardising the look of the map and the detail that is
31included on the map.
32(7) 807 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1COMMISSIONER PASCOE: Mr Rush, could I ask a question for a
2matter of clarification. When we had Deputy Commissioner
3Kieran Walshe here this morning, he spoke about the
4Victoria Police monitoring a project that the Western
5Australian police have looking at the aims of ICS and the
6capacity to upload data during an incident. What I am
7wondering is, with this system, at the level of the
8incident control centre, would it be possible for people to
9input information so that it would be directly available to
10the IECC, and then theoretically almost immediately
11available to be uploaded to the CFA and DSE
12websites?---That's right, that's what I meant by the fire
13sketcher tools. The trained personnel are able to add that
14incident information in, and what I mean by incident
15information is fire area information, control lines that
16are being constructed as well. If we need to sectorise and
17show the incident broken up into sectors and divisions, we
18can add all that information. As soon as that is saved it
19is available to all other users. Everyone that can access
20Firemap can view the detail in it, but only certain people
21that are trained can actually add the detail into it.
22Are you aware if there are trained people at the level of the
23incident control centre?---Yes, there's people trained
24throughout the state.
25Okay?---That are able to do it.
26Are you aware if they were inputting the data on
277 February?---Yes.
28We have heard of some gaps, then, in uploading to the CFA and
29DSE websites; do you have any sense of what might have
30caused those gaps?---I manage, I'm responsible for the
31internal business information systems. Yes, we do push
32(7) 808 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1some information on to the external web, but the external
2web is actually managed by a service provider to the
3Victorian Government. Also the movement of information on
4to that website is managed by the information unit within
5the IECC to my understanding.
6So from the point of inputting the information which is broadly
7available to members of the IECC, there's a further step
8before it is then publicly available on websites?---Yes.
9The information that stored in Firemap, one of the standard
10map products is a media map and that would be produced,
11including the full extent of the fire and then that PDF map
12placed on the external web for the public to access.
13Okay. Thank you.
14MR RUSH: Mr Griffiths, the way in which this is managed and the
15information it contains is only as good as the information
16that is coming from the fire ground?---That's right. It is
17the people at the fire ground who are providing that
18information.
19IRIS is another system that I would ask you to briefly turn to
20that you mentioned in your statement. What does the
21acronym stand for?---It is Incident Resource Information
22Systems and it is the system that we use to keep track of
23our resources during a deployment to an incident.
24In saying that are you able to keep track of individual vehicles
25or tankers or dozers and personnel?---That's right. We
26track personnel, also equipment and vehicles. We are able
27to dispatch them to incidents and then within the incident
28they are deployed to a sector within the incident.
29And from the system are you able to - if you need to put
30together a team, does it show the qualifications of persons
31who are available so that you can put together a particular
32(7) 809 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1team of people where necessary?---That's right. We have
2business rules in place that reflects all our standard
3crews and incident management team standard templates and
4we put business rules in place that if you need a certain
5qualification or medical or fitness standard to fulfil one
6of those roles, that is recorded as a business rule, and
7when you drag and drop a resource into that role, it does
8check whether that resource is capable of undertaking that
9role.
10So, for example, if you needed a level 3 incident controller at
11Alexandra at 4 o'clock in the afternoon of Saturday
127 February, you are able to bring that up on your
13information as to who is available?---Yes. I can search
14for resources of a certain capability, for example, and the
15capability we would be looking for is those that have level
163 incident controller accreditation.
17And it shows you the accreditation of the incident controller
18that is on duty at any particular time, I take it?---Yes.
19As I have just explained, once you deploy someone, drop
20them into a role, the system checks what qualifications
21that person has and checks against the requirements for
22that role. It will - if the person doesn't meet the
23requirements, it visually is represented on the screen.
24You refer in your statement to - I'm going to a different area,
25but you refer to what is called Sentinel hotspots which, as
26I understand it, are hotspots that are demonstrated by
27infrared technology, but this time taken from
28satellites?---Yes. There's a MODIS program and a website
29that is managed by Geoscience Australia in Canberra and
30they are able to compare previous images to the current
31image and determine surface temperature and then make an
32(7) 810 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1assumption that a fire has been ignited.
2Just to get a bit of background to that, you mentioned
3Geoscience Australia is the facility that they operate
4based in or near Alice Springs?---Yes, that's right. It is
5the MODIS satellite, which is an American satellite which
6we get two passes during daylight hours per day and there
7is a downlink site which Geoscience Australia manages at
8Alice Springs, so the data is able to be downloaded from
9the satellite, processed by Geoscience Australia and they
10create some spatial information, a spatial file showing the
11locations of fire ignitions.
12And so in a similar way to what we have seen with the linescan,
13and I say similar advisedly, is that able to reproduce on a
14map a hotspot of where a fire is?---That's right, and we do
15use that during an incident. If information from the
16incident is getting hard to get, we can use the Sentinel
17hotspots as information to make available to the incident
18management team.
19And you say that the satellite to your knowledge does two passes
20a day?---Yes. There's an Aqua and Terra satellite, I
21believe they are called, and one will pass during the
22morning and the other one during the afternoon.
23Was there any information from those passes passed through to
24the system on 7 February?---Yes, we are continually
25downloading data from the Sentinel website and it is
26available within Firemap.
27Can we have a look what was available from the passes on
287 February?---We can. But I did explain before that their
29Firemap is showing current information. I can find that
30information out, but it is just going to take me a bit of
31time. I would rather do that back in the office. But maps
32(7) 811 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1that were produced on the day would possibly have them on.
2I think in my statement, in appendicis there is at least
3one map in there that has the hotspots.
4I might find that while we are going through it, someone can. I
5didn't pick it up, Mr Griffiths. Is that the only
6satellite technology that is used by DSE, at least?---We
7can purchase satellite imagery from SPOT satellite, for
8example, a French satellite. We do have our own firescan
9that we can deploy. So, yes, from suppliers. We don't
10have any other access to satellite information. The MODIS
11satellite imagery is made available via a NASA website, and
12we do continually download that and make that available via
13the mapping section in FireWeb. So if I click on the MODIS
14tab in the mapping section there I see up-to-date imagery
15for the last two days, for today and yesterday, and there
16is also a history there, so we can go back in time and see
17the historical - - -
18We have seen the benefit of a linescan. Is the satellite
19imagery able to produce something that is similar to
20that?---The satellite imagery generally takes longer to be
21processed, whereas the feature of linescan is the
22timeliness of the acquisition of this information.
23But is the end result something that is similar to the
24linescan?---In regard to the MODIS data?
25No, we saw a map with the linescan of the fire at East Kilmore.
26Once the satellite information has been processed is it
27capable of giving an outline similar to a linescan?---I'm
28not aware of any infrared or commercial infrared satellite
29products. Generally you get a visual satellite image, so
30if there is a going fire you will see a lot of smoke.
31At para.31 of your statement you indicated that the Sentinel
32(7) 812 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1hotspots produce data - I am reading from the fourth line:
2"The data is processed to create a surface temperature
3image known as MOD 14 and algorithms are used to produce a
4thermal image". My query is for that thermal imaging, does
5cloud matter, or smoke matter?---Yes, I don't know the
6intimate details of how they do that processing, but we
7tend to get - you are correct in that infrared can't see
8through water vapour, so if there is cloud over a fire
9area, we can't - or low cloud in particular, we can't use
10the firescan.
11It says "locations of high temperature are identified and
12extracted from the image into a small text file transmitted
13in Alice Springs", and I will try to shorten this. Is
14there someone from DSE who can tell us just how this
15works?---I've tried to do that in my statement, yes.
16What I am suggesting from your statement is that if it is cloudy
17or smoky, if the satellite is picking up thermal imaging
18and temperature, that the cloud and smoke, except if there
19is water vapour, shouldn't get in the road of that
20imaging?---Yes, I'm not aware of the limitations of that
21product. I think we would need to ask Geoscience
22Australia.
23Thank you.
24COMMISSIONER MCLEOD: But wouldn't you, using that data, gain a
25familiarity with the data?---Yes, we do, and in instances
26where the fire is moving rapidly, it is a going incident,
27from my experience the Sentinel hotspots can provide a good
28overview, if it is a large fire, of where the activity of
29the fire is at the time that the satellite passed over the
30area. So it is able to see through the smoke if there is a
31lot of smoke generated from it. But I'm not sure how they
32(7) 813 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1work that out, meaning they may interpret the existence of
2smoke as that it is actually burning underneath, but I'm
3not sure.
4MR RUSH: Will you be able to provide to the Royal Commission
5copies of the passes that were made on 7 February?---Yes.
6If I can quickly go to other technology that you have referred
7to in your statement. One is the SPARC EyeFi system which
8we will see in the Royal Commission tomorrow. You refer to
9it at p.15 of your statement. But perhaps if I can lead
10you on this, Mr Griffiths. This was a pilot program that
11was established, from an operational sense, just prior to
127 February 2009?---It was a research and development
13project that I had a small role within, and my role was to
14facilitate contact with tower operators for the EyeFi
15equipment to be, or discussions to take place for the
16equipment to be fitted on those towers.
17And your own personal computer was downloaded with the necessary
18software to be able to use the cameras that were installed
19at some of the spotter towers in areas where there was fire
20on 7 February?---Yes. Simon Langdon visited my workplace
21in mid-December. We tried installing his client's software
22on a DSE computer and we couldn't access his map service
23and the site, which is the site where you can view the
24camera feed, the video feed. But I was able to use a
25separate laptop on a separate wireless network to access
26that map service.
27And so you were able to view through the cameras that were
28installed late in the afternoon of 7 February the fire, or
29some of the fires that were under way?---Yes, Simon sent me
30several emails late in the afternoon with some screen shots
31of what he was seeing on the EyeFi SPARC map surface.
32(7) 814 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1You say at 1800 on 7 February you were able to see the East Port
2Phillip fire 51. Which fire was that?---Yes. It was what
3I assumed was the East Port Phillip fire 51, which was in
4the Melbourne catchment area to the east of Healesville,
5and Simon sent me a screen grab showing the camera picture,
6showing smoke on it, and a coordinate that I was able to
7look on Firemap and determine it was very close to where a
8fire had been reported, which was the East Port Phillip
9fire 51.
10You also referred to a German smoke detection system, that there
11was, I think, a FIRE-Watch system which was trialled at DSE
12in a very limited way in 2006?---There was - it was
13actually 2003, we had a demonstration within our East
14Melbourne offices, and yes, a smoke detection system,
15that's right.
16And it was demonstrated, but that's where it was left?--- There
17was a power-point presentation. There was no physical
18equipment brought to the office. So we were able to see
19the presentation about how the cameras were used in Germany
20and we were told during that demonstration that some
21colleagues in Canada were preparing to conduct an
22evaluation of that system over their summer in 2003.
23And that evaluation has been conducted by Canadian Forest
24Engineering Research Group?---Correct.
25And from the detail that you provided in your statement, it is
26an evaluation that continued over two years, over two
27seasons?---The evaluation I believed continued over one
28season. They were evaluating two commercial products.
29FIRE-Watch was one of them. ForestWatch was another
30commercial product that was available. They also trialled
31a manually operated camera from a tower as well.
32(7) 815 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1The system in very basic terms works, does it, on the idea of
2taking two images a number of minutes apart and then the
3technology automatically compares those images to see if
4there is any distortion from one to the other?---Correct,
5and then if there is, an alarm is triggered.
6And if there is, an alarm is automatically triggered?---Which
7will notify an operator that is monitoring that video feed.
8The evaluations that you have provided us with, certainly in
9relation to the latter system, the ForestWatch Wildfire
10Smoke Detection System, reached conclusions that it was
11effective?---They did operationally trial ForestWatch for a
12number of years, but I am unaware whether it is still in
13use today.
14But in relation to what it set out to do, which was to pick
15smoke, it was reasonably effective?---The reports there
16document the number of false alarms that were triggered.
17They do say in the report that a lot of their man towers
18were becoming due for renewal, or to be reconstructed, and
19so they were looking for different options to constructing
20a tower for a human being to be placed in, so they were
21placing cameras on towers constructed just for cameras,
22that a person could not inhabit.
23I guess it is there for us all to read, but the system met the
24standards of Alberta and Saskatchewan in relation to the
25detection of smoke and it also was a system that not only
26worked during the daytime but had infrared technology to
27work in the night-time?---Yes, it states that in here.
28As far as you are aware, there has been no other follow up from
29DSE in relation to the system?---No. Well, ForestWatch we
30didn't get a demonstration of but it would not have been my
31decision to implement such a system, it would have been the
32(7) 816 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission
1- - -
2I understand. That's the same with the trial in relation to
3EyeFi technology?---Yes. As far as I know, we have a minor
4part in that project and I think the research and
5development project is to operationally or to technically
6prove that it is feasible to set up the cameras and to
7transmit the data.
8Thank you. I have no further questions.
9CHAIRMAN: Are there any questions?
10MS BUTTON: There will be some questions from the State but if
11any other parties wish to ask questions, we can follow up
12at the end.
13CHAIRMAN: I suppose it is really a matter of, if there are no
14questions we can excuse the witness.
15MR FARRANDS: Can I indicate, Mr Chairman, it is likely that we
16may have questions tomorrow morning.
17CHAIRMAN: Well, it is prudent to err on the side of caution and
18have the witness available tomorrow morning at 9.30.
19MR FARRANDS: We would be grateful.
20CHAIRMAN: I think in the circumstances that is what we will do.
21MR RUSH: Sir, could I ask, if Mr Griffiths is coming back, that
22he bring the Geoscience Sentinel material with him
23tomorrow?---I can try.
24MS MCLEOD: We need to have a discussion with counsel assisting
25about the production of those documents and we will try and
26do that tonight.
27CHAIRMAN: Yes, all right. We will adjourn now until 9.30.
28(THE WITNESS WITHDREW)
29ADJOURNED UNTIL WEDNESDAY 20 MAY 2009
30
31
32(7) 817 GRIFFITHS XN
33Bushfires Royal Commission